Printable Format12-715.
History: L. 1939, ch. 94, § 2; L. 1965, ch. 97, § 5; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Applied in upholding trial court's judgment that denial of rezoning was unreasonable. Golden v. City of Overland Park, 224 Kan. 591, 598, 584 P.2d 130.
2. Under facts, decision of board of zoning appeals was reasonable. Mouber v. City of Prairie Village, 6 Kan. App. 2d 972, 974, 637 P.2d 424 (1981).
3. Cities may appeal decisions of zoning boards which may be sued hereunder; granting of variances and conditions therefor considered. City of Olathe v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 10 Kan. App. 2d 218, 220, 221, 222, 696 P.2d 409 (1985).
4. Cited; conditions herein and city ordinance applying to area rather than use variance, height variance as area variance examined. City of Merriam v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 242 Kan. 532, 538, 748 P.2d 883 (1988).
5. Application for rezoning denied; not denial of procedural due process; shielded by state action immunity doctrine. Jacobs, Visconsi & Jacobs v. City of Lawrence, 927 F.2d 1111 (1991).
6. Denial of opportunity to apply for a building permit is appealable. Mid Gulf Inc. v Bishop, 792 F. Supp. 1205, 1206, 1210, 1211 (1992).