Printable Format19-2901.
History: L. 1939, ch. 165, § 1; L. 1941, ch. 196, § 1; L. 1945, ch. 171, § 1; L. 1947, ch. 201, § 1; L. 1953, ch. 153, § 1; L. 1961, ch. 153, § 1; L. 1963, ch. 194, § 1; L. 1981, ch. 122, § 1; Repealed, L. 1991, ch. 56, § 28; January 1, 1992.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Constitutionality of act raised but not determined. Duggins v. Board of County Commissioners, 179 Kan. 101, 293 P.2d 258.
2. Zoning permit which allowed building of motel held not unreasonable. Hillebrand v. Board of County Commissioners, 180 Kan. 348, 350, 304 P.2d 517.
3. Legislative history of county zoning laws discussed. Spurgeon v. Board of Commissioners, 181 Kan. 1008, 1012, 317 P.2d 798.
4. Constitutionality not determinable because question not raised in trial court. Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 183 Kan. 19, 21, 325 P.2d 382.
5. State agency required to conform to land use zoning regulations; no automatic immunity. Brown v. Kansas Forestry, Fish and Game Commission, 2 Kan. App. 2d 102, 112, 576 P.2d 230.
6. Cited in construing K.S.A. 19-1921; exemption of agricultural purpose buildings from county zoning regulations held to include dwelling place. Blauvelt v. Board of Leavenworth County Comm'rs, 227 Kan. 110, 111, 114, 605 P.2d 132.
7. This and following sections cited in holding action commenced under K.S.A. 19-2913 governed by time limit for filing appeals under K.S.A. 60-511, not 19-223 or 60-2101(d). Bolser v. Zoning Board of Aubry Township, 4 Kan. App. 2d 288, 289, 605 P.2d 156.
8. Continuity of zoning promotes legislative policy that stable land use is beneficial to public. Colonial Investment Co. v. City of Leawood, 7 Kan. App. 2d 660, 665, 646 P.2d 1149 (1982).
9. Use of land for hunting preserve as agricultural use not requiring special permit determined. Corbet v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rs, 14 Kan. App. 2d 123, 125, 783 P.2d 1310 (1990).