Printable Format20-2002.
History: L. 1899, ch. 130, § 2; L. 1915, ch. 201, § 1; R.S. 1923, 20-2002; L. 1927, ch. 182, § 2; L. 1941, ch. 218, § 2; L. 1955, ch. 189, § 2; L. 1963, ch. 215, § 1; L. 1967, ch. 184, § 2; L. 1969, ch. 169, § 17; L. 1972, ch. 103, § 2; L. 1976, ch. 149, § 10; Repealed, L. 1976, ch. 146, § 48; L. 1976, ch. 150, § 3; January 10, 1977.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. May limit claim to jurisdictional amount and abandon remainder. Merywethers v. Youmans, 81 Kan. 309, 105 P. 545.
2. No jurisdiction to enjoin enforcement of judgment of foreign court. Milling Co. v. Stevens, 94 Kan. 745, 748, 147 P. 815.
3. When judgment must be entered considered. Olthoff v. Adams, 121 Kan. 39, 245 P. 743.
4. Jurisdiction of court considered; on appeal from city court, district court has only jurisdiction of city court. Hinds v. Fine, 162 Kan. 328, 333, 176 P.2d 847.
5. Rule requiring service of notice of appeal and bond on opposing counsel not complied with; appeal properly perfected under applicable statutes. Applehans v. Beever, 189 Kan. 667, 668, 371 P.2d 127.
6. Mentioned; pendency of complaint and issuance of warrant even though defective tolled statute of limitations. State v. Hemminger, 210 Kan. 587, 591, 502 P.2d 791.