Source or Prior Law:

21-906.

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

Survey of Recent Cases, 43 K.L.R. 1000 (1995).

"The Uniform Statute and Rule Construction Act: Help, Hindrance, or Irrelevancy?" Adrienne L. Mickells, 44 K.L.R. 423, 442 (1996).

Attorney General's Opinions:

Abortion providers required to report minor child under 16 years of age seeking abortion as evidence of sexual abuse. 2003-17.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Marriage between first cousins valid in Kansas if valid where celebrated and not odious to public policy nor evasive. In re Estate of Loughmiller, 229 Kan. 584, 590, 629 P.2d 156 (1981).

2. Cited; effect of changes in statutes involving indecent liberties with child (K.S.A. 21-3503, 21-3504) discussed. State v. Armstrong, 238 Kan. 559, 565, 712 P.2d 1258 (1986).

3. Evidence of previous sexual relationship, use of interpreters, prosecutorial comments, competency of victim discussed. State v. Perrigo, 10 Kan. App. 2d 651, 708 P.2d 987 (1985).

4. Cited; license to practice law suspended indefinitely pending appeal from conviction hereof. In re Keithley, 238 Kan. 245, 708 P.2d 984 (1985).

5. Cited; crime and penalty at time of offense control unless legislature gives retroactive effect to change made subsequent to commission of offense. State v. Van Cleave, 239 Kan. 117, 122, 716 P.2d 580 (1986).

6. Necessity of mistrial after admission by juror of hearing impairment examined. State v. Miller, 11 Kan. App. 2d 410, 722 P.2d 1131 (1986).

7. Direct appeal from sentence imposed after plea of guilty or nolo contendere (K.S.A. 22-3602) examined. State v. Harrold, 239 Kan. 645, 722 P.2d 563 (1986).

8. Cited; classification of aggravated indecent liberties (K.S.A. 21-3504) under prior law examined. State v. Ramos, 240 Kan. 485, 489, 731 P.2d 837 (1987).

9. Not lesser included offense (K.S.A. 21-3107) of rape (K.S.A. 21-3502); prior sexual relations, limiting instructions, prosecutorial remarks examined. State v. Moore, 242 Kan. 1, 7, 9, 748 P.2d 833 (1987).

10. Cited; rape (K.S.A. 21-3502), indecent liberties with child (K.S.A. 21-3503), aggravated criminal sodomy (K.S.A. 21-3506) as non-identical offenses examined. State v. Hutchcraft, 242 Kan. 55, 744 P.2d 849 (1987).

11. Conviction affirmed; use of closed-circuit television for testimony of alleged child-victim (K.S.A. 22-3434) as constitutional examined. State v. Chisholm, 243 Kan. 270, 273, 755 P.2d 547 (1988).

12. Cited; two-pronged test to determine whether lesser crime is lesser included offense (K.S.A. 21-3107(2)(d)) examined. State v. Fike, 243 Kan. 365, 372, 757 P.2d 724 (1988).

13. Cited; person released from custody as not subject to speedy trial provisions of K.S.A. 22-4303 examined. State v. Julian, 244 Kan. 101, 102, 765 P.2d 1104 (1988).

14. Sufficiency of trial court's individualized finding regarding trauma to child-victim witness if testifying in open court (K.S.A. 22-3434) examined. State v. Albert, 13 Kan. App. 2d 671, 778 P.2d 386 (1989).

15. Right to confront child-victim witness, testimony via TV (K.S.A. 22-3434) examined. State v. Chisholm, 245 Kan. 145, 777 P.2d 753 (1989).

16. Sight barrier to prevent child-victim from seeing defendant, charges of indecent liberties and aggravated incest as multiplicitous examined. State v. Siard, 245 Kan. 716, 783 P.2d 895 (1989).

17. Cunnilingus as not constituting sodomy (K.S.A. 21-3505) noted; conviction for aggravated incest based upon such act cannot stand. State v. Schad, 247 Kan. 242, 795 P.2d 406 (1990).

18. When defendant is related to victim as provided in this statute, state may charge aggravated incest but not indecent liberties with a child. State v. Williams, 250 Kan. 730, 829 P.2d 892 (1992).

19. Under facts alleged and proved, conviction hereunder bars prosecution for indecent liberties and aggravated criminal sodomy. State v. Chandler, 17 Kan. App. 2d 512, 839 P.2d 551 (1992).

20. Consecutive sentences mandated by specific provisions in K.S.A. 21-4608(4) as controlling over general provisions in K.S.A. 21-4608(7) examined. State v. Daniels, 18 Kan. App. 2d 338, 853 P.2d 65 (1993).

21. Cited in holding court lacked jurisdiction to convict father of rape of 15 year-old daughter where father also convicted of aggravated kidnapping. Carmichael v. State, 18 Kan. App. 2d 435, 438, 856 P.2d 934 (1993).

22. Whether aggravated incest statute applies to sexual relationships between half-blood uncle and minor daughter of half-brother examined. State v. Craig, 254 Kan. 575, 576, 867 P.2d 1013 (1994).

23. When defendant commits forcible intercourse with relative as section defines, state may charge aggravated incest, not rape. Carmichael v. State, 255 Kan. 10, 11, 18, 872 P.2d 240 (1994).

24. Whether rape sentence where victim and defendant related should be vacated and remanded for aggravated incest resentencing examined. State v. Rowell, 256 Kan. 200, 214, 883 P.2d 1184 (1994).

25. Whether reclassification of sentencing aggravated incest sentence as aggravated criminal sodomy violates ex post facto law prohibition examined. State v. Colston, 20 Kan. App. 2d 107, 112, 883 P.2d 1231 (1994).

26. Whether defendant who voluntarily entered into plea agreement was denied effective assistance of counsel examined. Baker v. State, 20 Kan. App. 2d 807, 810, 894 P.2d 221 (1995).

27. Whether a person can be convicted as an aider and abettor of crime person could not be convicted of as principal examined. State v. McMullen, 20 Kan. App. 2d 985, 987, 894 P.2d 251 (1995).

28. Defendant stipulated to aggravated incest for sentencing purposes. U.S. v. Passi, 62 F.3d 1278, 1281 (1995).

29. Requires proof of specific intent; specific intent distinguished from general intent. State v. Esher, 22 Kan. App. 2d 779, 783, 922 P.2d 1123 (1996).

30. Defendant's allegation that he should have been charged with lesser offense did not render guilty plea involuntary. Hunt v. Daily, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1038, 1040 (1999).

31. Aggravated incest cannot be considered a lesser included offense of rape or indecent liberties with a child. Beem v. McKune, 278 F.3d 1108, 1109 (2002).

32. Conviction for aggravated incest reversed because of cumulative effect of trial errors. State v. Plaskett, 271 Kan. 995, 27 P.3d 890 (2001).

33. Resentencing of habeas petitioner for general rather than specific sex crime did not violate due process. Beem v. McKune, 317 F.3d 1175, 1179 (2002).

34. Case dismissed on double jeopardy grounds because intentional misconduct of state's primary witness forces mistrial. State v. Wittsell, 30 Kan. App. 2d 1083, 53 P.3d 1248 (2002).

35. Under facts of case, defendant could be charged with attempted rape but not with attempted aggravated incest. State v. Sims, 33 Kan. App. 2d 762, 108 P.3d 1007 (2005).

36. Mentioned in case involving discussion of what constitutes a "persistent sex offender." State v. Lowden, 38 Kan. App. 2d 858, 862, 174 P.3d 895 (2008).

37. Charges under K.S.A. 8-1567 and 21-3608a are not multiplicitous. State v. Cott, 288 Kan. 643, 206 P.3d 514 (2009).