59-2913.
History: L. 1965, ch. 348, § 13; L. 1976, ch. 243, § 13; L. 1976, ch. 242, § 74; L. 1978, ch. 224, § 1; Repealed, L. 1996, ch. 167, § 65; April 18.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Where defendant attacks confession on grounds of mental incompetency, he must overcome presumption of sanity by substantial competent evidence. State v. Pursley, 238 Kan. 253, 257, 258, 710 P.2d 1231 (1985).
|