Printable Format60-308. Service outside state. (a) Proof and effect. (1) Service of process may be made on any party outside this state. If on a party domiciled in this state or on a party that has submitted to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state, such service provides personal jurisdiction over that party; otherwise it provides in rem jurisdiction over specifically identified property that party has in this state.
(2) The service of process must be made: (A) In the same manner as service within this state, by an officer authorized to serve process in this state or in the state where the party is served; or (B) by a party or the party's attorney pursuant to subsection (c) of K.S.A. 60-303, and amendments thereto. No order of a court is required. The server must file an affidavit or a declaration pursuant to K.S.A. 53-601, and amendments thereto, or any other competent proof, stating the time, manner and place of service. The court may consider the affidavit, declaration or any other competent proof in determining whether service has been properly made.
(3) No default may be entered until the expiration of at least 30 days after service. A default judgment rendered on service outside this state may be set aside only on a showing that is timely and sufficient under subsection (b) of K.S.A. 60-260, and amendments thereto, to set aside a default judgment.
(b) Submitting to jurisdiction. (1) Any person, whether or not a citizen or resident of this state, who in person or through an agent or instrumentality does any of the following acts, thereby submits the person and, if an individual, the individual's representative, to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state for any claim for relief arising from the act:
(A) Transacting any business in this state;
(B) committing a tortious act in this state;
(C) owning, using or possessing real estate located in this state;
(D) contracting to insure any person, property or risk located in this state at the time of contracting;
(E) entering into an express or implied contract, by mail or otherwise, with a resident of this state to be performed in whole or in part by either party in this state;
(F) acting in this state as director, manager, trustee or other officer of any corporation organized under the laws of or having a place of business in this state or as executor or administrator of any estate in this state;
(G) causing to persons or property in this state an injury arising out of an act or omission outside this state by the defendant if, at the time of the injury, either:
(i) The defendant was engaged in solicitation or service activities in this state; or
(ii) products, materials or things processed, serviced or manufactured by the defendant anywhere were used or consumed in this state in the ordinary course of trade or use;
(H) living in a marital relationship in this state notwithstanding subsequent departure from this state, for all obligations arising for maintenance, child support or property settlement under the Kansas family law code, chapter 23 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, and amendments thereto, if the other party to the marital relationship continues to reside in this state;
(I) serving as insurer of a person at the time of an act by the person which is the subject of an action in a court of competent jurisdiction in this state which results in judgment being taken against the person;
(J) having sexual intercourse in this state, in an action seeking to adjudge the person to be a parent of a child and in an action to require the person to provide support for a child as provided by law, if: (i) The conception of the child results from the act; and (ii) the other party to the act or the child continues to reside in this state;
(K) entering into an express or implied arrangement, whether by contract, tariff or otherwise, with a corporation or partnership residing or doing business in this state under which the corporation or partnership has supplied transportation services or communication service or equipment, including telephonic communication services, for a business or commercial user when the services supplied to the user are managed, operated or monitored in this state, provided that the person is given reasonable notice that arranging or continuing the transportation services or communication services may result in jurisdiction under this section; or
(L) having contact with this state which would support jurisdiction consistent with the constitutions of the United States and of this state.
(2) A person submits to the jurisdiction of the courts of this state for a claim for relief which did not arise in this state if substantial, continuous and systematic contact with this state is established which would support jurisdiction consistent with the constitutions of the United States and of this state.
(c) Section not exclusive. Nothing in this section affects the right to serve process in any other manner provided by law.
History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-308; L. 1971, ch. 195, § 1; L. 1972, ch. 221, § 1; L. 1976, ch. 253, § 1; L. 1982, ch. 152, § 23; L. 1986, ch. 215, § 16; L. 1989, ch. 178, § 1; L. 1990, ch. 202, § 9; L. 2000, ch. 175, § 4; L. 2006, ch. 49, § 1; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 153; L. 2012, ch. 162, § 77; May 31.
Source or prior law:
(a). G.S. 1868, ch. 80, §§ 76, 77; L. 1871, ch. 113, § 1; L. 1909, ch. 182, §§ 82, 83; R.S. 1923, 60-2529, 60-2530.
Cross References to Related Sections:
Extension of time for answer, see 60-206.
When defenses and objections presented, see 60-212.
Personal service of summons, see 60-304.
Proof of service of summons, see 60-312.
Nonresidents, process service upon, see "Cross References to Related Sections" under 60-304.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Long arm" provisions of subsection (b) explained prior to legislative enactment, Leonard O. Thomas, 31 J.B.A.K. 160, 163, 164 (1962).
Comparable sections of similar Illinois statute treated and discussed, 6 K.L.R. 487 to 490 (1958).
"Highlights of Kansas Code of Civil Procedure (1963)," Spencer A. Gard, 2 W.L.J. 199, 202 (1963).
"Enlarged Jurisdiction Under the New Code—The New Long Arm Statute," Leonard O. Thomas, 33 J.B.A.K. 85 (1964).
"The Enlargement of Jurisdiction Over Unlicensed Foreign Corporations Committing Torts in Kansas: New Code 60-308," Russell D. Jacobson, 12 K.L.R. 49 (1963).
"Some Comments on the New Code of Civil Procedure," Emmet A. Blaes, 12 K.L.R. 75, 77 (1963).
Paragraph (b)(6); in personam judgments in divorce suits, Dan Hopson, Jr., 12 K.L.R. 27, 36 (1963).
"Wrongful Death and the Choice-of-Law Problem," Edward G. Collister, Jr., 13 K.L.R. 529, 531 (1965).
Detailed discussion with respect to business transactions providing jurisdiction, Dennis L. Bieker, 5 W.L.J. 240 to 248 (1966).
"Extraterritorial In Personam Jurisdiction: The Substantive Due Process Requirement," John H. Johntz, Jr., 13 K.L.R. 554, 562, 563 (1965).
1963-65 survey of civil practice, Earl B. Shurtz, 14 K.L.R. 171, 172 (1965).
This statute only changed the mode of procedure and not a party's substantive rights, Gregory L. Roth, 36 J.B.A.K. 336, 337 (1967).
"Caveat Venditor—Strict Products Liability Under the Uniform Commercial Code," Norman E. Beal, 16 K.L.R. 285, 296 (1968).
Decision holding agents for principal not personally amenable to service of process discussed in "U.S. District Court," William O. Isenhour, Jr., 37 J.B.A.K. 194 (1968).
Decision construing paragraph (b)(1) discussed in survey of business association law, William E. Treadway, 17 K.L.R. 181, 185, 188 (1968).
"Civil Procedure—Service of Process—Extraterritorial Jurisdiction on Foreign Corporations Transacting Business Under the 'Long Arm' Statute," Ray L. Borth, 7 W.L.J. 375, 377, 381, 382 (1968).
Survey of Kansas family law, Harvey S. Berenson, 17 K.L.R. 349, 364 (1969).
"Cause of Action Under K.S.A. 60-308 and K.S.A. 60-603(3)," Robert J. Fowks, 38 J.B.A.K. 291, 292, 293, 294 (1969).
Survey of Kansas commercial law (1965-1969), 18 K.L.R. 388, 392 (1970).
Note on U.S. district court cases, Larry McEnroe, 39 J.B.A.K. 373 (1970).
"Long Arm and Convenient Forum," Robert C. Casad, 20 K.L.R. 1 (1971).
"Domestic Relations: The Role of Long Arm Statutes," Linda D. Henry, 10 W.L.J. 487, 489 (1971).
Comment defining the phrase "the transaction of any business within this state" contained in K.S.A. 60-308(b)(1), Eldon L. Boisseau, 11 W.L.J. 323, 324 (1972).
"URLTA, Kansas, and the Common Law," Michael J. Davis, 21 K.L.R. 387, 391, 392 (1973).
"A Practical Review of the 1975 Kansas Probate Code Revisions," Philip S. Frick, 44 J.B.A.K. 137, 139 (1975).
Survey of civil procedure, Elizabeth R. Herbert, 15 W.L.J. 315, 316 (1976).
Subsection (b) cited in note discussing personal jurisdiction over a foreign corporation based on acts of parent, 25 K.L.R. 109, 110, 116, 122 (1976).
"Civil Procedure: Kansas Prejudgment Attachment and the Due Process Clause," Scott J. Gunderson, 17 W.L.J. 163, 169 (1977).
"Child Support and the New Federal Legislation," R. E. Schulman and Peter E. Rinn, 46 J.B.A.K. 105, 112 (1977).
"Brown and Miles: At Last, An End to Ambiguity in the Kansas Law of Comparative Negligence," Hal D. Meltzer, 27 K.L.R. 111, 131 (1978).
"Single contract" provision of the Kansas long arm statute, Nancy Schmidt Roush, 27 K.L.R. 135 (1978).
Recent U.S. District Court decisions, John A. Price, 47 J.B.A.K. 287, 300 (1978).
"Survey of Kansas Law: Civil Procedure," Jerry G. Elliott, 27 K.L.R. 185, 188 (1979).
"Survey of Kansas Law: Family Law," Camilla Klein Haviland, 27 K.L.R. 241, 250 (1979).
"Tolling the Statute of Limitations: Restricted by Enlarged Personal Jurisdiction," L. Stephen Garlow, 18 W.L.J. 565, 568, 571 (1979).
"42 U.S.C. § 649 and the Kansas Order of Garnishment," James R. Russell, 48 J.B.A.K. 37, 48 (1979).
"The Uniform Parentage Act: An Opportunity to Extend Equal Protection to All Kansas Children," Dwight A. Corrin, 19 W.L.J. 110, 121 (1979).
"Civil Procedure: The Refinement of the Contacts Doctrine of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction," William E. Bartholdt, Jr., 20 W.L.J. 137, 139 (1980).
"Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act," Carl A. Gallagher, 20 W.L.J. 409, 422 (1981).
"Survey of Kansas Law: Civil Procedure," 29 K.L.R. 449, 450, 452, 453, 454 (1981).
"In the Best Interests of the Divided Family: An Analysis of the 1982 Amendments to the Kansas Divorce Code," Nancy G. Maxwell, 22 W.L.J. 177, 244 (1983).
"Recent Development in Kansas Civil Procedure," E. Elinor P. Schroeder, 32 K.L.R. 515, 522 (1984).
"Survey of Kansas Law: Family Law," Nancy G. Maxwell, 32 K.L.R. 543, 579, 580 (1984).
"Jurisdiction—Long Arm Jurisdiction over Corporate Directors—Schlatter v. Mo-Comm Futures, Ltd.," LesLee Huttie, 32 K.L.R. 736, 739, 751 (1984).
"Some Observations on the Kansas Product Liability Act (Part 2)," William Edward Westerbeke, 54 J.K.B.A. 39, 49 (1985).
"Torts: Liquor Vendor Liability in a Multistate Tort [Ling v. Jan's Liquors, 237 Kan. 629, 703 P.2d 731 (1985)]," Tim Lutz, 25 W.L.J. 610, 612, 613 (1986).
"Class Action Jurisdiction Over Nonresident Plaintiffs—Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co. (Shutts II)," Steven K. Linscheid, 33 K.L.R. 525, 535 (1985).
"Service of Process by Certified Mail," Robert C. Casad, 59 J.K.B.A. No. 10, 25 (1990).
"Kansas Products Liability: Joint and Several Liability in the Chain of Supply and Distribution," William E. Westerbeke, XIV J.K.T.L.A. No. 3, 21 (1991).
"Choice of Law: Kansas Supreme Court Delays Reconsideration of Traditional Choice of Law Standards and Applies Kansas Law Based on Overriding Public Policy [St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. International Playtex, Inc., 245 Kan. 258, 777 P.2d 1259 (1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 758 (1990)]," Jonathan Louis Laurans, 30 W.L.J. 339, 342 (1991).
"Long-Arm Jurisdiction in Kansas," Steve A. Leben and Mark D. Hinderks, 62 J.K.B.A. No. 4, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36 (1993).
"A Practical Guide to Service of Process Abroad," Harold A. Houck, J.K.T.L.A. Vol. XX, No. 4, 14 (1997).
"From the Capitol," Kirk Lowry, J.K.T.L.A. Vol. XXI, No. 3, 8 (1998).
"Caveat plaintiff: Congress has defederalized private securities litigation," Steven A. Ramirez, 67 J.K.B.A. No. 9, 16 (1998).
"General Jurisdiction in Kansas," Robert C. Casad, 76 J.K.B.A. No. 4, 27 (2007).
Attorney General's Opinions:
Agricultural corporations; limitations; exceptions. 92-148.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
Prior law cases, see G.S. 1949, 60-2529, 60-2530 and the 1961 Supp. thereto.
1. Nonresident executed unaccepted checks to resident in Kansas; cause of action arose in Kansas. National Bank of America at Salina v. Calhoun, 253 F.Supp. 346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351.
2. Subsection (b)(1) held constitutional; subsections (b)(1), (2), (3) and (4) adopted from Illinois and carry with them construction placed on them by courts of that state. Woodring v. Hall, 200 K. 597, 600, 601, 438 P.2d 135.
3. "Transaction of any business" construed; to distinguish between "private" and "commercial" business disregards clear and mandatory language of statute; loaning of money constitutes transaction of business. Woodring v. Hall, 200 K. 597, 600, 606, 607, 609, 438 P.2d 135.
4. In personam judgment permitted herein satisfies due process; section provides minimum contacts with forum state, adequate notice of claim and full opportunity to appear and be heard. Woodring v. Hall, 200 K. 597, 602, 603, 609, 438 P.2d 135.
5. Section remedial in character; retroactive application does not deprive defendant of any vested right. Woodring v. Hall, 200 K. 597, 603, 604, 605, 438 P.2d 135.
6. Section construed; subsection (b)(5)(ii) does not confer in personam jurisdiction unless nonresident defendant can anticipate direct or indirect financial benefit from the sale, trade, use or service of its products in Kansas. Tilley v. Keller Truck & Implement Corp., 200 K. 641, 642, 643, 645, 646, 647, 648, 649, 650, 438 P.2d 128.
7. Section held constitutional; due process requirements of fourteenth amendment satisfied. Tilley v. Keller Truck & Implement Corp., 200 K. 641, 644, 650, 438 P.2d 128.
8. Action against out-of-state seller for breach of implied warranty barred; tolling provisions of statute inapplicable. Futura Music, Inc. v. Gates Radio Company, 399 F.2d 308, 310.
9. Subsection (a)(2) applied; trial court may consider the affidavit of service or any other competent proofs in determining whether out-of-state service has been properly made. Cadwallader v. Lehman, 202 K. 738, 743, 451 P.2d 163.
10. Subsection (a)(1) applied; personal service of summons upon a nonresident outside the state has the effect of service by publication. Cadwallader v. Lehman, 202 K. 738, 743, 451 P.2d 163.
11. Subsection (b)(6) examined, construed and applied; provisions not applied retroactively; in personam judgment valid. Scott v. Hall, 203 K. 331, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 454 P.2d 449.
12. Subsection (b)(2) applied; where nonresident commits tortious act within state, administrator of his estate subject to jurisdiction of courts of this state. Barr, Administratrix v. MacHarg, Administrator, 203 K. 612, 614, 615, 617, 455 P.2d 516.
13. Defendant's contact with state insufficient to render in personam judgment; unilateral activity of plaintiff cannot satisfy requirement. White v. Goldthwaite, 204 K. 83, 84, 87, 460 P.2d 578.
14. One visit by defendant, initiated by plaintiff, when order and delivery took place out of state, is not substantial connection. Oswalt Industries, Inc. v. Gilmore, 297 F.Supp. 307, 308, 310, 311, 312, 313 (1969).
15. Sufficient nexus not proven; district court correctly declined to exercise in personam jurisdiction. Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. Riffe, 409 F.2d 1277, 1280.
16. Subsection (b) applied; nonresident investing partners held subject to personal jurisdiction. Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. Anderson, 410 F.2d 303, 304, 305.
17. Subsection (b)(1) applied; Chase Manhattan Bank, as nonresident garnishee, held not subject to personal judgment. Land Manufacturing, Inc. v. Highland Park State Bank, 205 K. 526, 527, 528, 529, 530, 531, 470 P.2d 782.
18. Subsection (b) cited; service of summons on nonresident defendant not quashable in face of a prima facie showing of jurisdictional facts. Hanson v. Murphy, 208 K. 297, 301, 491 P.2d 551.
19. Acts and transactions in Kansas were sufficient to uphold in personam jurisdiction over foreign resident and such jurisdiction continued on removal. Doyn Aircraft, Inc. v. Wylie, 443 F.2d 579, 582.
20. Contract provision could not bring Kansas long-arm statute into operation simply by agreement of parties. Misco Leasing, Inc. v. Vaughn, 450 F.2d 257, 259.
21. Contention long arm statute applicable in action for damages not upheld; application of uniform reciprocal enforcement of support act (23-451 et seq.). Thompson v. Kite, 214 K. 700, 702, 522 P.2d 327.
22. Service hereunder; garnishment in aid of execution; garnishee's motions overruled. McClintock v. McCall, 214 K. 764, 765, 522 P.2d 343.
23. Subsection (b)(5) construed and applied; exercise of in personam jurisdiction under facts violative of due process. Misco-United Supply, Inc. v. Richards of Rockford, Inc., 215 K. 849, 850, 851, 528 P.2d 1248.
24. Jurisdiction over subsidiary corporation founded on theory that court had jurisdiction over parent corporation. Farha v. Signal Companies, Inc., 216 K. 471, 473, 479, 532 P.2d 1330. Original opinion modified, 217 K. 43, 535 P.2d 463.
25. Applied; alleged sex discrimination occurring in Kansas; action properly laid in Kansas for jurisdictional purposes although corporation had closed Kansas office. Ford v. Volmac Industries, Inc., 494 F.2d 330, 331.
26. Total participation of parent in affairs of subsidiary corporation did not amount to domination of day-to-day decisions, under facts. Quarles v. Fuqua Industries, Inc., 504 F.2d 1358, 1359, 1361.
27. Paternity action; sexual intercourse between consenting parties did not constitute tortious act authorizing personal service hereunder; failure to support ancillary issue. State, ex rel., v. Schutts, 217 K. 175, 176, 177, 178, 181, 535 P.2d 982.
28. Subsection (b)(8) restricts jurisdiction to situations where parties lived in marital relationship in Kansas. Whisenant v. Whisenant, 219 K. 387, 391, 392, 393, 394, 548 P.2d 470.
29. Defendant precluded from relief under 60-260 where failure to comply with subsection (a) (3). Automatic Feeder Co. v. Tobey, 221 K. 17, 18, 20, 558 P.2d 101.
30. Foreign municipal corporations are subject to suit in this state to the same extent as nonresident private corporations. Hillhouse v. City of Kansas City, 221 K. 369, 370, 559 P.2d 1148.
31. Under facts, defendant's essential contacts with Kansas insufficient to sustain long-arm jurisdiction in action on contract; motion to transfer denied. Peebles v. Murray, 411 F.Supp. 1174, 1175, 1176, 1177, 1178.
32. Where nonresident corporation controlled and dominated Kansas subsidiary, such corporation was doing business in connection with transactions within Kansas within the meaning of the statute. Intern. U., United Auto., etc. v. Cardwell Mfg. Co., 416 F.Supp. 1267, 1282.
33. Trial court had in personam jurisdiction; contacts sufficient. Prather v. Olson, 1 K.A.2d 142, 144, 145, 147, 562 P.2d 142.
34. Section cited; defendant was not doing business in this state. Scrivner v. Twin Americas Agricultural & Industrial Developers, Inc., 1 K.A.2d 404, 408, 573 P.2d 614.
35. Cited; tolling provision of 60-517 not activated when substituted service under 8-401 or 60-308 is available. Carter v. Kretschmer, 2 K.A.2d 271, 272, 577 P.2d 1211.
36. Living in a marital relationship in Kansas; sufficient contact; jurisdiction conferred to decide matters on absent spouse and children. Varney v. Varney, 222 K. 700, 701, 702, 703, 567 P.2d 876.
37. Under subsection (b)(1) personal jurisdiction obtained under "agent or instrumentality" clause over defendant director. Professional Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Roussel, 445 F.Supp. 687.
38. Under subsection (b) defendant's acts of filing takeover proposal and mailing solicitations to shareholders clearly constituted "transaction of business." Professional Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Roussel, 445 F.Supp. 687.
39. Subsection (b)(5) construed; foreign corporation not authorized to do business in Kansas when it brought suit; held corporation was resident under this section when it later was authorized to do business. Pedi Bares, Inc. v. P & C Food Markets, Inc., 567 F.2d 933.
40. Subsection (a)(2) mentioned; affidavit of service not shown in record; service of process proper; substantial compliance with requirements sufficient. Pedi Bares, Inc. v. P & C Food Markets, Inc., 567 F.2d 933, 934, 936.
41. Defendant in Ohio served personally hereunder in action under 60-1611; Kansas court had jurisdiction to order property division and award alimony. Kendall v. Kendall, 224 K. 624, 625, 627, 585 P.2d 978.
42. Sufficient contacts with Kansas to support in personam jurisdiction; subsections (b)(1) and (5) applied. Rosedale State Bank and Trust Co. v. Stringer, 2 K.A.2d 331, 332, 333, 579 P.2d 158.
43. Subsection (b) applied; jurisdiction over nonresident corporation proper where the corporation was a wholly owned subsidiary of corporation doing business in Kansas. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Superior Oil Co., 460 F.Supp. 483.
44. Fraudulent misrepresentation made by telephone from foreign state to Kansas held to be "tortious act" and within meaning of this section. J.E.M. Corp. v. McClellan, 462 F.Supp. 1246.
45. Subsection (b)(5) authorizes service on one whose contract with a Kansas resident gives rise to an action by a third-party beneficiary. International Pizza Hut, etc. v. Supreme Pizza, Inc., 464 F.Supp. 65.
46. Activities of New York horse dealer held not sufficient to qualify for personal jurisdiction under subsection (b)(1), but were sufficient under (b)(2) and (b)(5). Ammon v. Kaplow, 468 F.Supp. 1304, 1308, 1309, 1310, 1313.
47. Subsection (b)(2) inapplicable; plaintiff failed to allege that defendant had committed a tort. Tappen v. Ager, 599 F.2d 376, 378.
48. If provisions of statute met, exercise of in personam jurisdiction must afford defendant due process of law under 14 th amendment to U.S. Constitution. Davis v. Grace, 4 K.A.2d 704, 707, 708, 711, 610 P.2d 1140.
49. Defendant's mere absence from state did not toll statute of limitations. Gideon v. Gates, 5 K.A.2d 23, 26, 29, 611 P.2d 166.
50. Absence from state means beyond reach of process from our courts. Bray v. Bayles, 4 K.A.2d 596, 600, 601, 609 P.2d 1146. Reversed in part on other grounds: 228 K. 481, 484, 618 P.2d 807.
51. Sufficient contacts with Kansas for jurisdiction as to Missouri corporation, but not as to Delaware corporation or Missouri individual. Odam v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 5 K.A.2d 612, 614, 615, 616, 617, 621 P.2d 453.
52. Subsection (b)(8) requires showing that a marital domicile is established. Perry v. Perry, 5 K.A.2d 636, 638, 639, 623 P.2d 513.
53. Trial court committed error in holding lessees of certain oil and gas interests in Woodson County not doing business in Kansas. Klippel v. Heintz, 231 K. 312, 313, 314, 644 P.2d 428 (1982).
54. Physical presence of defendant not a requirement in determining jurisdiction hereunder but only a factor to consider. Thermal Insulation Systems, Inc. v. Ark-Seal Corporation, 508 F.Supp. 434, 436, 437, 438, 440, 441, 442 (1981).
55. In personam jurisdiction proper in case involving breach of contract and fraud by out-of-state resident. Kemper v. Rohrich, 508 F.Supp. 444, 446, 447, 448 (1981).
56. In personam jurisdiction denied; not consistent with due process clause because of lack of minimum contacts. Midwest Elevator Systems, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, 508 F.Supp. 578, 580, 581, 582 (1981).
57. Constitutional and statutory requirements met for invoking jurisdiction hereunder. Grimandi v. Beech Aircraft Corporation, 512 F.Supp. 764, 766, 769 (1981).
58. Personal jurisdiction proper; defendant transacted business in state within meaning of subsection (b)(1). Inter-Collegiate Press, Inc. v. Myers, 519 F.Supp. 765, 768, 769 (1981).
59. Applied to personal representative of person committing tort or transacting business within state. Professional Investors Life Insurance Co., Inc. v. Roussel, 528 F.Supp. 391, 404 (1981).
60. In divorce action no jurisdiction to consider issues of property division and child support when no continuous residence maintained in Kansas. Guye v. Guye, 8 K.A.2d 219, 220, 654 P.2d 482 (1982).
61. Nonresident directors of a nonresident corporation doing business in Kansas held not subject to in personam jurisdiction. Schlatter v. Mo-Comm Futures Ltd., 233 K. 324, 326, 330, 332, 333, 337, 338, 662 P.2d 553 (1983).
62. Special process server under 60-303 must be authorized in Missouri if defendant served there. Hall v. Quivira Square Development Co., 9 K.A.2d 243, 245, 247, 675 P.2d 931 (1984).
63. Colorado residents, bringing suit in Colorado state court later transferred to Kansas federal court, not transacting business in Kansas. Norris by Rector v. Peterson, 573 F.Supp. 341, 343 (1983).
64. Statute applied to Texas subcontractor of Kansas general contractor on Texas construction; extensive contracts in Kansas. Carrothers Const. Co. v. Quality Service and Supply, 586 F.Supp. 134, 137 (1984).
65. Possible under (b)(2) to sue in Kansas for injuries occurring therein where negligent conduct occurred elsewhere. Ling v. Jan's Liquors, 237 K. 629, 633, 703 P.2d 731 (1985).
66. Statute unnecessary in suit to collect attorney fees for defending frivolous legal malpractice claim transferred to Kansas from Colorado. Morris by Rector v. Peterson, 759 F.2d 809, 811, 812 (1985).
67. Provisions of (b)(5), modeled after Illinois law, extends jurisdiction to outer limits of due process required by federal constitution. Helitzer v. Helitzer, 761 F.2d 582, 585 (1985).
68. Exercise of personal jurisdiction proper where defendant purposefully avails itself of privilege of acting within forum and invoking laws. Petroleum Data Serv. v. First City Bancorporation, 622 F.Supp. 1022, 1024 (1985).
69. Plaintiff need only show prima facie case of jurisdictional fact of conspiracy or entry into state under (b)(2). Wegerer v. First Commodity Corp. of Boston, 744 F.2d 719, 727, (1984).
70. New York corporation subject to personal jurisdiction even though business transacted solely through licensing agreements with wholly independent corporations. Triple A Partnership v. MPL Communications, Inc., 629 F.Supp. 1520 (1986).
71. Japanese manufacturer selling automobiles to exclusive American distributor in Japan subject to Kansas jurisdiction. Cunningham v. Subaru of America, Inc., 631 F.Supp. 132, 133 (1986).
72. Statute applicable to maker of note where note provided maker was to pay bank at Kansas office. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Culver, 640 F.Supp. 725 727 (1986).
73. Cited; jurisdiction over Missouri development corporations and Kansas investment firm allegedly involved in two-state transaction noted. Cal. Caulfield and Co. v. Colonial Nursing Homes, 642 F.Supp. 777, 778 (1986).
74. Cited; lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction over Panamanian corporation when Kansan injured on cruise ship noted. Tirks v. Carnival Cruise Lines, 642 F.Supp. 971, 975 (1986).
75. Cited; lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction over former Wisconsin church official now residing in Missouri noted. Knuth v. Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, 643 F.Supp. 444, 445, 446 (1986).
76. Cited; lack of jurisdiction over New York corporation in suit by Kansas corporation over contract consummated in Texas examined. Green Country Crude, Inc. v. Avant Petroleum, Inc., 648 F.Supp. 1443 (1986).
77. Cited; jurisdiction over nonresident employees examined; entering state as agent for corporation does not establish minimum contacts. NL Industries, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Industries, 650 F.Supp. 1115, 1136, 1137 (1986).
78. Cited; lack of jurisdiction over unincorporated nonresident professional basketball association with incidental Kansas contact examined. Hall v. National Basketball Ass'n, 651 F.Supp. 335 (1987).
79. Cited; nationwide service of process in federal securities and RICO cases negates jurisdictional analysis under long arm statute. Wichita Federal S. & L. Ass'n v. Landmark Group, 657 F.Supp. 1182, 1192, 1194 (1987).
80. Cited; applied where nonresident employer and employees did business in Kansas and employees later quit in New York. Volt Delta Resources, Inc. v. Devine, 241 K. 775, 781, 740 P.2d 1089 (1987).
81. Cited; sovereignty of state within own boundaries, judicial comity examined. Head v. Platte County, Mo., 242 K. 442, 447, 749 P.2d 6 (1988).
82. Statute applicable in medical malpractice claim to Missouri physician where medication prescription in Missouri resulted in injury in Kansas. Ray v. Heilman, 660 F.Supp. 122, 123 (1987).
83. Non resident employers "transacted business" in Kansas by soliciting and negotiating with resident in Kansas knowing residence and some work to be in state. Berrigan v. Southeast Health Plan, Inc., 676 F.Supp. 1062, 1063 (1987).
84. Foreign manufacturers' designation of American corporation to market products nationwide sufficient for jurisdiction under statute. Bohannon v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 682 F.Supp. 42, 43 (1988).
85. Japanese corporation that designed motorcycles as being in stream of commerce and within scope of service examined. Wessinger v. Vetter Corp., 685 F.Supp. 769, 770 (D. Kan. 1987).
86. Nonresident owners of Kansas turnpike authority bonds subject to declaratory judgment action following defeasance of bonds by refinancing. Kansas Turnpike Authority v. Wheeler, 243 K. 602, 615, 760 P.2d 1213 (1988).
87. Applicability to nonresident defendants who allowed individual to act as soliciting agent in state determined. Source Associates, Inc. v. Suncast Group, 709 F.Supp. 1023 (D. Kan. 1989).
88. Factors establishing jurisdiction examined; nonresident bank's stamping "P.E.G." on back of check creates no contract creating personal jurisdiction. Eferakeya v. Twin City Bank, 13 K.A.2d 197, 198, 766 P.2d 837 (1989).
89. Termination of parental rights (38-1581 et seq.) not subject to requirements of minimum contacts rule. In re M.L.K., 13 K.A.2d 251, 255, 768 P.2d 316 (1989).
90. Personal jurisdiction over New York collecting bank denied where insufficient state contacts existed; denial of due process determined. Eferakeya v. Twin City State Bank, 245 K. 154, 161, 777 P.2d 759 (1989).
91. Insurance coverage in punitive damages award examined where foreign corporate defendant's commercial activities in Kansas resulted in jurisdiction. St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. International Playtex, Inc., 245 K. 258, 265, 777 P.2d 1259 (1989).
92. Alleged contract was with Kansas resident, performed in part in state and a causal connection exists between contract and cause of action. US Sprint Communications Co. v. Boran, 716 F.Supp. 505, 509 (1988).
93. Alleged injury occurred at principal place of business of seller of loan servicing rights and performance of part of contract was in state. Corinthian Mortg. Corp. v. First Sec. Mortg. Co., 716 F.Supp. 527, 529, 530 (1989).
94. Personal jurisdiction over foreign corporation in products liability action considered. Johnson v. Goodyear S.A. Colmar Berg 716 F.Supp. 531, 532, 533 (1989).
95. Requirements of section were met as contract was performed in part in Kansas. Insulation Corp. of America v. Sportsplex, Inc., 716 F.Supp. 540, 542 (1989).
96. Based on facts, defendant purposefully established minimum contacts with the forum. Slawson v. Hair, 716 F.Supp. 1373, 1376 (1989).
97. Contract held to be agreement to be performed in whole or in part in Kansas; exercise does not violate due process. Marcus Food Co. v. Family Foods of Tallahassee, 729 F.Supp. 753, 756, 760 (1990).
98. In personam jurisdiction for issues arising from marital relationship determined by constitutional limitations; marital domicile not required. In re Marriage of Brown, 247 K. 152, 155, 162, 795 P.2d 375 (1990).
99. Court first assesses whether defendant's conduct falls within statute; court then decides whether jurisdiction comports with due process. Composite Marine Propellors, Inc. v. Gerbig Vander-Woude, 741 F.Supp. 873, 876 (1990).
100. Two-step analysis in determining whether nonresident defendant's contacts with forum state strong enough to warrant jurisdiction examined. Deines v. Vermeer Mfg. Co., 752 F.Supp. 989, 998 (1990).
101. Statute applies to alleged conduct of police and employer that allegedly caused injury in Kansas. Taylor v. Phelan, 912 F.2d 429 (1990).
102. Subjecting out-of-state corporate maker of note to jurisdiction does not violate due process; maker initiated contacts with Kansas payee. Travel Unlimited v. Touch Technologies, 755 F.Supp. 987, 990 (1991).
103. Nonresident director of corporation with place of business in Kansas subject to in personam jurisdiction. Anderson v. Heartland Oil & Gas, Inc., 249 K. 458, 468, 819 P.2d 1192 (1991).
104. Jurisdiction held to extend to out-of-state guarantor of third-party beneficiary contract entered into with Kansas resident. Noel v. Pizza Hut, Inc., 15 K.A.2d 225, 240, 805 P.2d 1244 (1991).
105. Personal jurisdiction of nonresident defendant discussed; insurance company agent amenable to personal jurisdiction. Stephenson v. Barriger, 758 F.Supp. 657, 660, 661 (1991).
106. Lack of personal jurisdiction discussed; subparagraphs (1) and (5) of subsection (b) discussed. Biederman v. Schnader, Harrison, Siegal & Lewis, 765 F.Supp. 1057, 1059 (1991).
107. Bond rating service subject to long-arm jurisdiction; discussion of exercise of personal jurisdiction hereunder. Fidelity State Bank & Trust Co. v. Merrill Lynch, 768 F.Supp. 300, 303, 304 (1991).
108. Single shipment of ink to Kansas buyer not "substantial connection"; manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction. National Gypsum Co. v. Dalemark Industries, Inc., 773 F.Supp. 1476 (1991).
109. Foreign corporate directors not subject to personal jurisdiction under long arm statute although alleged aware and acquiesced in sales of securities in state. Farr v. Designer Phosphate and Premix Intern., Inc., 777 F.Supp. 890 (1991).
110. Out-of-state corporation committed no tortious act in state; negotiations and alleged misrepresentations took place in New Jersey. National Gypsum Co. v. Dalemark Industries, Inc., 779 F.Supp. 147 (1991).
111. Jurisdiction over nonresident defendants over contracts to be performed in part in Kansas considered; single contract provision, due process concerns. Marcus Food Co. v. Crown Meat Co., Inc., 779 F.Supp. 514 (1991).
112. Alleged scheme to defraud caused injury to Kansas bank; jurisdiction to extent allowed by due process clause. Fidelity State Bank, Garden City, Kan. v. Oles, 130 B.R. 578 (1991).
113. Under 60-303(c)(3) process servers may serve any process which only involves delivery of process not writs of execution or orders of attachment. Steele v. City of Wichita, 250 K. 524, 528, 826 P.2d 1380 (1992).
114. Contractual forum-selection clause waives necessity of long-arm statute and any constitutional requirement of minimum contact. Vanier v. Ponsoldt, 251 K. 88, 101, 833 P.2d 949 (1992).
115. Submission of claims in liquidation proceeding by out-of-state party subjects party to personal jurisdiction in proceeding. Todd v. Lakeland Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc., 17 K.A.2d 1, 834 P.2d 387 (1992).
116. Exercise of jurisdiction over Indiana contracted carrier paid from shipper's Kansas office upheld. Oxford Transp. Ser. v. Mab. Refrig. Transport, 792 F.Supp. 710, 711 (1992).
117. Broker did not deliberately consummate any transaction in Kansas that would subject him to personal jurisdiction. Thompson v. Chambers, 804 F.Supp. 188, 189, 190, 195 (1992).
118. Default judgment entered before time provided by (c) is void. Bethany Medical Center v. Niyazi, 18 K.A.2d 80, 82, 847 P.2d 1341 (1993).
119. Whether nonresident manufacturer's contacts with state subjected it to personal jurisdiction examined. Anguish v. Seymour Mann, Inc., 826 F.Supp. 401, 402 (1993).
120. Whether foreign corporation established minimum contacts in state to subject it to personal jurisdiction examined. Kimbrell v. ADIA, S.A., 834 F.Supp. 1313, 1315 (1993).
121. Whether claim against transportation broker should be dismissed for lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction examined. Brandi v. Belger Cartage Service, Inc., 842 F.Supp. 1337, 1340 (1993).
122. Whether service void because out-of-state corporate process server not officer of state in which service made examined. In re Marriage of Welliver, 254 K. 801, 807, 869 P.2d 653 (1994).
123. Review of price dissenting shareholders received for stock in cash-out merger; appraisal request and jurisdiction examined. In re Hesston Corp., 254 K. 941, 951, 967, 870 P.2d 17 (1994).
124. Whether out-of-state private seller had sufficient contacts with state to establish personal jurisdiction examined. Environmental Ventures, Inc. v. Alda Services Corp., 19 K.A.2d 292, 295, 299, 868 P.2d 540 (1994).
125. Whether defendant entered into contract with resident of state that was to be performed in state examined. Source Direct, Inc., v. Mantell, 19 K.A.2d 399, 404, 870 P.2d 686 (1994).
126. Whether advertisements and insurer relocating its corporate headquarters subjected out-of-state insurer to personal jurisdiction examined. Federated Rural Elec. Ins. v. Kootenai Elec., 17 F.3d 1302, 1305 (1994).
127. Whether patentee's receipt of payment under contract with licensee supported exercise of personal jurisdiction examined. Pehr v. Sunbeam Plastics Corp., 874 F.Supp. 317, 320 (1995).
128. Sufficient contacts existed between party and customer to confer jurisdiction. California Sec. v. Multimedia Cablevision, Inc., 897 F.Supp. 316, 320 (1995).
129. Court had jurisdiction over Nebraska corporation for personal injury arising out of hunting tournament co-sponsored with Kansas corporations. Flannagan v. Bader, 905 F.Supp. 933, 937 (1995).
130. Court had jurisdiction over out-of-state corporation because tortious conduct affected plaintiff within state. Blue Moon Licensing, Inc. v. Gregorek, 906 F.Supp. 603, 605 (1995).
131. Sexual intercourse outside state, while relevant regarding personal jurisdiction under (b)(10), not dispositive on subject matter jurisdiction in child support action. Carrington v. Unseld, 22 K.A.2d 815, 818, 923 P.2d 1052 (1996).
132. Nonresident defendant business had sufficient contacts with state to establish personal jurisdiction. Heat and Coll Master Network v. Contractor Success, 935 F.Supp. 1167, 1170 (1996).
133. Single letter sent by defendant to plaintiff did not support exercise of personal jurisdiction. Electronic Realty Assoc. v. Paramount Pictures, 935 F.Supp. 1172, 1173, 1175 (1996).
134. Fiduciary shield doctrine did not preclude exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant. Dazey Corp. v. Wolfman, 948 F.Supp. 969, 972 (1996).
135. Court declines jurisdiction where defendant's only contact with state was telephone call. Kohnle v. U.S. Telecom, Inc., 960 F.Supp. 249, 251 (1997).
136. Partial payment on contract subjected nonresident to long arm jurisdiction. Aspen Products, Inc. v. Global Distributors, Inc., 24 K.A.2d 475, 476, 947 P.2d 49 (1997).
137. Out-of-state manufacturer not subject to personal jurisdiction under long arm statute. Finance & Marketing Ass'n Intern., Inc. v. He-Ro Group, Inc., 975 F.Supp. 1429, 1431 (1997).
138. Out-of-state hotel's contacts were not sufficient to subject it to personal jurisdiction in state. S F Hotel Company, L.P. v. Energy Investments, Inc., 985 F.Supp. 1032, 1033 (1997).
139. Alleged out-of-state patent infringer was subject to personal jurisdiction in state. Snyder Industries, Inc. v. Clawson Container Co., 991 F.Supp. 1279, 1281 (1998).
140. Venue for petition for a writ of mandamus lies in county where tax warrant is docketed. Copeland v. Robinson, 25 K.A.2d 717, 729, 970 P.2d 69 (1998).
141. Exercise of jurisdiction over nonresident corporation did not violate due process. Etienne v. Wolverine Tube, Inc., 12 F.Supp.2d 1173, 1177 (1998).
142. Exercise of jurisdiction over nonresident employee of resident corporation for breaching noncompetition clause did not violate due process. Sprint Corp. v. DeAngelo, 12 F.Supp.2d 1184, 1186 (1998).
143. Limited contacts with state did not preclude exercise of jurisdiction over nonresident defendant. Etienne v. Wolverine Tube, Inc., 15 F.Supp.2d 1060, 1061 (1998).
144. Plaintiff established prima facie case of specific jurisdiction over nonresident corporation in trademark case. Packerware Corp. v. B&R Plastics, Inc., 15 F.Supp.2d 1074, 1077 (1998).
145. Chairman of nonresident corporation contacts with state were sufficient for court to exercise jurisdiction. Maverick Paper Co. v. Omaha Paper Co., Inc., 18 F.Supp.2d 1232, 1234 (1998).
146. Court had personal jurisdiction over one defendant but lacked personal jurisdiction over another defendant in securities fraud action. Bradshaw v. Baptiste, 23 F.Supp.2d 1236, 1238 (1998).
147. Defendant who allegedly infringed patent not subject to personal jurisdiction; venue improper in state. Morrison Co., Inc. v. WCCO Belting, Inc., 35 F.Supp.2d 1293, 1296 (1998).
148. Out-of-state attorney's contracting to represent Kansas resident did not constitute transacting business in state. Worthington v. Small, 46 F.Supp.2d 1126, 1129 (1999).
149. Defendant's occasional phone calls into state did not give state personal jurisdiction over defendant. Hudye Soil Services, Inc. v. Tyler, 46 F.Supp.2d 1157, 1161 (1999).
150. Court had personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendant in misappropriation of trade secret claim. Wempe v. Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc., 61 F.Supp.2d 1165, 1167 (1999).
151. Telephone call to Kansas farm cooperative regarding sale of corn by Colorado farmer constitutes minimum contact with state to assert in personam long-arm jurisdiction and does not offend due process clause of 14 th amendment. St. Francis Mercantile Equity Exchange, Inc. v. Newton, 27 K.A.2d 18, 996 P.2d 365 (2000).
152. Defendant sued for patent infringement not subject to court's personal jurisdiction. Hogdon Power Co., Inc., v. Clean Shot Tech., Inc., 92 F.Supp.2d 1170, 1172 (2000).
153. Performance of contract in state absent evidence parties contemplated such performance did not subject nonresident defendant to personal jurisdiction. Custom Energy, LLC v. Conservation Group, 93 F.Supp.2d 1145, 1147 (2000).
154. Foreign counterclaim defendants who had not conducted business in state not subject to state court jurisdiction. Cotracom Commodity Trading Ag. v. Seaboard Corp., 94 F.Supp.2d 1189, 1193 (2000).
155. Insurer's payment of benefits and communication with insured did not constitute purposeful availment for jurisdictional purposes. Whittaker v. Medical Mut. of Ohio, 96 F.Supp.2d 1197, 1198 (2000).
156. Defendant's contacts with state sufficient for court to assert jurisdiction. Thermal Components Company v. Griffith, 98 F.Supp.2d 1224, 1227 (2000).
157. Payments by out-of-state defendant to offices in state constituted sufficient contacts for exercise of personal jurisdiction. Rusty Eck Ford-Mercury v. Amer. Custom Coachworks, 184 F.Supp.2d 1138, 1141 (2002).
158. Service under 40-218 provided personal jurisdiction in Kansas court; law of place of contracting (Nebraska) controls; one-year limitation to sue in contract is against public policy of Nebraska, which has five-year statute of limitations on contracts. Novak v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co., 29 K.A.2d 526, 28 P.3d 1033 (2001).
159. Defendants had sufficient contacts with state to be subject to personal jurisdiction. B-S Steel of Kansas v. Texas Industries, Inc., 229 F.Supp.2d 1209, 1219 (2002).
160. Court lacked jurisdiction over nonresident defendant in price fixing claim. Four B Corp. v. Ueno Fine Chemicals Industry, Ltd., 241 F.Supp.2d 1258, 1261 (2003).
161. No personal jurisdiction over defendant manufacturer involving motorcycle bought in Oklahoma by Kansas resident; selling dealer was independently owned dealership. Kluin v. American Suzuki Motor Corp., 274 K. 888, 56 P.3d 829 (2002).
162. Plaintiff did not establish state long-arm jurisdiction over defendant law firm. Scott v. Home Choice, Inc., 252 F.Supp.2d 1129, 1136 (2003).
163. Court had jurisdiction over seller of stock in negligent and fraudulent misrepresentation claim. Universal Prem. Acceptance v. Oxford Bank & Trust, 277 F.Supp.2d 1120, 1126 (2003).
164. Consumer plaintiff allegation that manufacturer was alter ego of parent justified exercise of personal jurisdiction. Luc v. Krause Work GMBH & Co., 289 F.Supp.2d 1282, 1287 (2003).
165. Contract providing for North Carolina as forum to settle disputes is mandatory and must be enforced by Kansas court. Aylward v. Dar Ran Furniture Industries, Inc., 32 K.A.2d 697, 87 P.3d 341 (2004).
166. Racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations act (RICO) does not authorize nationwide service of process against defendants. Multi-Media Intern, LLC v. Promag Retail Services, 343 F.Supp.2d 1024, 1027 (2004).
167. Kansas long arm statute to be liberally construed to full extent permitted by due process. Loeffelbein v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 33 K.A.2d 593, 106 P.3d 74 (2005).
168. Foreign parent manufacturer defendant was subject to specific personal jurisdiction. Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., 358 F.Supp.2d 1042, 1047 (2005).
169. Trial court had jurisdiction over adjoining state's police board members where wrongful death claim arose in Kansas. McNeal v. Zobrist, 365 F.Supp.2d 1166, 1169 (2005).
170. Stream of commerce theory can be applied to provide a basis for personal jurisdiction in price-fixing conspiracy cases; jurisdiction can be obtained if either physical or economic injury occurs in the state as a result of a negligent act outside the state. Merriman v. Crompton Corp., 282 K. 433, 461, 464, 468, 146 P.3d 162 (2006).
171. Long-arm statute construed liberally, jurisdiction allowed to extent permitted by due process. Sunlight Saunas, Inc. v. Sundance Sauna Inc., 427 F.Supp.2d 1011, 1016 (2006).
172. Sufficient contacts by defendant for due process protections to assert personal jurisdiction over defendant. Mohr v. Margolis, Ainsworth & Kinlaw Consulting, 434 F.Supp.2d 1051, 1059 (2006).
173. Personal jurisdiction over non-resident who designed and tested product allegedly injuring plaintiff. Spicer v. New Image Intern, Inc., 447 F.Supp.2d 1226, 1231 (2006).
174. Sufficient contacts and partial performance of contract in Kansas sufficient for personal jurisdiction over defendant. Smith & Loveless, Inc. v. Caicos Corp., 471 F.Supp.2d 1140, 1150 (D. Kan. 2007).
175. For jurisdiction to exist under (b)(1) of K.S.A. 60-308 there must be nexus between transaction of business and claim. Thompson v. Jiffy Lube Intern., Inc., 505 F.Supp.2d 907, 916, 917 (2007).
176. Cited; non-resident corporate director held not subject to personal jurisdiction under long-arm statute; no acts in Kansas. Blair-Naughton L.L.C. v. Diner Concepts, Inc., 568 F.Supp.2d 1249, 1257 (2008).
177. Cited; long-arm statute may be triggered by tortious acts outside the forum which cause injury to resident. Sheldon v. Khanal, 605 F.Supp.2d 1179 (2008).
178. Defendant had insufficient contacts with Kansas to expose him to Kansas court jurisdiction. Mr. Cinnamon of Kansas, Inc., v. Hall, 41 K.A.2d 457, 202 P.3d 734 (2009).
179. Exercise of personal jurisdiction over Pakistani vendor improper under Kansas long-arm statute. GFSI, Inc. v. Comfort Knitwears (PVT), Ltd., 726 F.Supp.2d 1298 (D. Kan. 2010).
180. No personal jurisdiction found for a foreign corporation under facts of this case. Martin-Manatee Power Partners v. Peerless Mfg. Co., 44 K.A.2d 75, 233 P.3d 758 (2010).
181. California ranchers' act in purposely filing action in California against Kansas animal feed supplier did not create specific personal jurisdiction over ranchers in supplier's subsequent malicious prosecution action in Kansas. Midwest Manufacturing, Inc. v. Ausland, 47 K.A.2d 221, 273 P.3d 804 (2012).
182. Plaintiff presented a prima facie case of personal jurisdiction over defendant under (b)(1)(B); case reversed and remanded. Aeroflex Wichita, Inc. v. Filardo, 294 K. 258, 275 P.3d 869 (2012).
183. Texas owner of livestock management company transacted business in Kansas for specific personal jurisdiction under the facts of the case. Vestring v. Halla, 920 F.Supp.2d 1189 (D. Kan. 2013).
184. Court found it reasonable and consistent with the notions of "fair play and substantial justice" to assert personal jurisdiction over California law firm and one of its attorneys in a lawsuit. Hutton & Hutton Law Firm, LLC v. Girardi & Keese, 96 F.Supp.3d 1208, 1226 (D. Kan. 2015).
185. Kansas' long-arm statute is construed liberally to permit exercise of jurisdiction in every situation that is consistent with the United States constitution. Inspired by Design, LLC, v. Sammy's Sew Shop, LLC, 200 F.Supp.3d 1194, 1201 (D. Kan. 2016).
186. Kansas court had personal jurisdiction over out-of-state internet protocol geolocation company when company misidentified 600 million IP addresses with a Kansas residence, prompting visits and calls by law enforcement and private individuals. Arnold v. MaxMind, Inc., 216 F.Supp.3d 1275, 1280-81 (D. Kan. 2016).
187. Kansas' long-arm statute permits the exercise of any jurisdiction that is consistent with the United States Constitution, so a court need not conduct a separate personal jurisdiction analysis under Kansas law and may proceed directly to the due process inquiry. Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. Madison Companies, 428 F. Supp. 3d 591, 600 (D. Kan. 2019).