Source or prior law:

(a). L. 1865, ch. 53, § 1; G.S. 1868, ch. 80, §§ 542, 543; L. 1889, ch. 245, § 1; L. 1901, ch. 278, § 1; L. 1907, ch. 256, § 1; L. 1909, ch. 182, §§ 565, 566; L. 1915, ch. 187, § 1; R.S. 1923, 60-3302, 60-3303.

Revisor's Note:

1975 amendment of this section repealed, see L. 1976, ch. 251, § 38.

Cross References to Related Sections:

Receivership case, appeals, see 60-1305.

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

Appeals hereunder in the nature of certiorari, "Highlights of the Kansas Code of Civil Procedure (1963)," Spencer A. Gard, 2 W.L.J. 199, 216 (1962).

1963-65 survey of family law, John W. Brand, Jr., and Dan Hopson, Jr., 14 K.L.R. 271, 276 (1965).

Paragraphs (a) and (b) mentioned in 1963-65 survey of civil practice, Earl B. Shurtz, 14 K.L.R. 171, 174, 186, 187 (1965).

Discussed in connection with formal requirements for notice of appeal, Robert C. Casad, 34 J.B.A.K. 20, 77, 78, 79 (1965).

"Mandamus—An Expanded Concept," Ralph W. Muxlow II, 8 W.L.J. 71, 72 (1968).

"Mandamus as an Appellate Device" Roger D. Stanton, 18 K.L.R. 383, 384, 385 (1970).

Comment on use of mandamus to vacate interlocutory orders, 11 W.L.J. 491, 492 (1972).

Survey of civil procedure, Elizabeth R. Herbert, 15 W.L.J. 315, 321 (1976).

"Researching Legislative Intent," Fritz Snyder, 51 J.K.B.A. 93, 95 (1982).

"Workers' Compensation: The Exclusive Remedy Rule Is Alive and Well in Kansas[Hormann v. New Hampshire Insurance Co., 236 Kan. 190, 689 P.2d 837 (1984)]," Janet K. Kerr, 25 W.L.J. 192, 200 (1985).

"The Rule of Capture Applied to the Underground Storage of Natural Gas—Anderson v. Beech Aircraft Corp.," Tanya J. Treadway, 34 K.L.R. 801, 812 (1986).

"Motions to Disqualify Opposing Counsel," Mark F. Anderson, 30 W.L.J. 238, 256 (1991).

"Kansas Appellate Advocacy: An Inside View of Common-Sense Strategy," Patrick Hughes, 66 J.K.B.A. No. 2, 26 (1997).

"Writing to the Kansas appellate courts: a lesson in appellate jurisdiction," Autumn Fox, 69 J.K.B.A. No. 4, 32 (2000).

"Criminal Procedure Survey of Recent Cases," 50 K.L.R. 901 (2002).

"Gunfight at the K-12 Corral: Legislative vs. Judicial Power in the Kansas School Finance Litigation," Richard E. Levy, 54 K.L.R. 1021 (2006).

"Education of Attorneys on Appeal and/or Cross Appeal," James Oliver, 78 J.K.B.A. No. 3, 21 (2009).

"Waiting for Judgment Day: Negotiating the Interlocutory Appeal in 8 Easy Lessons," Jonathan Paretsky, 78 J.K.B.A. No. 4, 30 (2009).

CASE ANNOTATIONS

Prior law cases, see G.S. 1949, 60-3302, 60-3303 and the 1961 Supp. thereto.

1. Unsuccessful motion to strike pleading is not appealable. Materi v. Spurrier, 192 Kan. 291, 292, 387 P.2d 221.

2. No purpose in reviewing cases determining "final order" or phrase "merits of the action or some parts thereof"; sections repealed by new code. Connell v. State Highway Commission, 192 Kan. 371, 373, 374, 375, 388 P.2d 637.

3. Mentioned; trial court's order vacating default judgment not final. Whitaker v. Continental Casualty Co., 192 Kan. 705, 707, 391 P.2d 309.

4. Rulings on motion to strike are not appealable unless final, affect substantial right or determine action. Bobo v. Mutual of Omaha Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn., 193 Kan. 465, 468, 395 P.2d 317.

5. Order denying motion to set aside default judgment if final and therefore appealable. Williams v. State Highway Commission, 194 Kan. 18, 23, 397 P.2d 341.

6. Orders overruling motion to make definite and certain and sustaining motion for pretrial conference not final. Heise v. Thomas, 194 Kan. 240, 241, 398 P.2d 350.

7. Word "final" is given ordinary meaning; appeal lies when all issues are determined. Connell v. State Highway Commission, 192 Kan. 371, 374, 388 P.2d 637.

8. Order denying motion to dismiss challenging constitutionality of statute not appealable unless final. Cusintz v. Cusintz, 195 Kan. 301, 302, 404 P.2d 164.

9. Order granting new trial not final order. Oertel v. Phillips, 197 Kan. 113, 114, 116, 117, 415 P.2d 223.

10. Order granting new trial appealable if court's jurisdiction is in question. Landscape Development Co. v. Kansas City P. & L. Co., 197 Kan. 126, 127, 135, 415 P.2d 398.

11. Subsection (b) cited; interlocutory appeal taken in action involving crop damage. Burnison v. Fry, 199 Kan. 277, 278, 428 P.2d 809.

12. Cited in construing provisions of K.S.A. 44-556. Johnson v. General Motors Corporation, 199 Kan. 720, 723, 433 P.2d 585.

13. Appeal prematurely brought; pretrial orders lacked requisite semblance of finality. In re Austin, 200 Kan. 92, 94, 435 P.2d 1.

14. Failure to make timely appeal from trial court order does not prevent subsequent review of ruling in appeal from final judgment; prior law mentioned. Caywood v. Board of County Commissioners, 200 Kan. 134, 136, 434 P.2d 780.

15. Order granting new trial held not appealable under subsection (a) until after the second trial. Kansas State Highway Commission v. Roepke, 200 Kan. 660, 662, 438 P.2d 122.

16. Order amending sheriff's return after satisfaction of judgment appealable. Transport Clearing House, Inc. v. Rostock, 202 Kan. 72, 73, 75, 82, 447 P.2d 1.

17. Appellate jurisdiction concerning receivers and receiverships not subject to the amount of money involved, and such limitation has no application to other statutory provisions for appeals. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Moulds, 202 Kan. 557, 560, 451 P.2d 215.

18. Interlocutory appeal under subsection (b) "improvidently" granted. City of Manhattan v. Eriksen, 204 Kan. 150, 155, 460 P.2d 522.

19. Subsection (b) cited; interlocutory appeal of controlling question of law allowed. Flowers, Administratrix v. Marshall, Administrator, 208 Kan. 900, 901, 494 P.2d 1184.

20. Cited in holding trial court without jurisdiction to rule on a labor controversy. Inland Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Local Union, 209 Kan. 349, 355, 496 P.2d 1327.

21. Court erred in failing to grant mistrial; coercing jury; no final judgment entered; appeal dismissed. Higgs v. Biernacki, 210 Kan. 261, 263, 264, 499 P.2d 1058.

22. Order denying intervention by state is appealable under subsection (a); compliance with subsection (b) not required. Campbell American Legion v. Wade, 210 Kan. 537, 540, 541, 502 P.2d 773.

23. Mentioned; cross-appeal dismissed after principal appeal dismissed; cross-appeal held not appealable order standing alone. Carr v. Carr, 212 Kan. 638, 512 P.2d 357.

24. Order overruling motion for summary judgment not final decision required hereunder; false premise to base challenge to cross-appeal. Vaughn v. Murray, 214 Kan. 456, 461, 521 P.2d 262.

25. Subsection (b) applied; independent action may not be maintained against board of tax appeals. Joseph v. McNeive, 215 Kan. 270, 271, 524 P.2d 765.

26. Referred to; implied covenant to develop oil and gas lease; cancellation of lease upheld. Shaw v. Henry, 216 Kan. 96, 99, 531 P.2d 128.

27. Appeal from order overruling motion to quash subpoena not an intermediate appeal; supreme court has appellate jurisdiction. Kansas Commission on Civil Rights v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 216 Kan. 306, 309, 532 P.2d 1263.

28. Order dismissing counter-claim held not appealable in advance of final decision. Stock v. Nordhus, 216 Kan. 779, 781, 533 P.2d 781.

29. Order vacating default judgment and permitting answer to be filed not final appealable order. Bates & Son Construction Co. v. Berry, 217 Kan. 322, 324, 537 P.2d 189.

30. Appeal from administrative agency decision properly taken to district court is further appealable from district court to supreme court. Olathe Hospital Foundation, Inc. v. Extendicare, Inc., 217 Kan. 546, 550, 539 P.2d 1.

31. Order overruling motion to quash order of garnishment not final appealable order. Gulf Ins. Co. v. Bovee, 217 Kan. 586, 587, 538 P.2d 724.

32. Section construed; payment of docket fee not necessary to perfect appeal from magistrate court to district court. Avco Financial Services v. Caldwell, 219 Kan. 59, 60, 61, 62, 547 P.2d 756.

33. Order by trial court dismissing appeal to supreme court from final order of district court erroneous. Johnson v. Johnson, 219 Kan. 190, 192, 547 P.2d 360.

34. Pretrial order determining question of right of indemnification from codefendant not appealable until after final judgment. Meddles v. Western Power Div. of Central Tel. & Utilities Corp., 219 Kan. 331, 333, 334, 548 P.2d 476.

35. Applied; divorce proceeding; bifurcated ruling; latest order fixed date from which appeal ran. McCain v. McCain, 219 Kan. 780, 783, 549 P.2d 896.

36. Order refusing to issue citation for contempt and terminating child support appealable order. Strecker v. Wilkinson, 220 Kan. 292, 294, 552 P.2d 979.

37. In determining amount in controversy, plaintiff authorized to add to amount of claim amount of judgment on counterclaim; attorney fees as costs. Central Finance Co., Inc. v. Stevens, 221 Kan. 1, 3, 558 P.2d 122.

38. "Final decision," defined as used in subsection (a)(4). Henderson v. Hassur, 1 Kan. App. 2d 103, 105, 106, 107, 562 P.2d 108.

39. Order granting new trial pursuant to K.S.A. 60-259 (a) upheld; interlocutory appeal dismissed. Smith v. Morris, 2 Kan. App. 2d 59, 60, 574 P.2d 568.

40. Denial of motion for summary judgment not appealable under subsection (a)(3); interlocutory order; title to real estate not involved. In re Estate of Ziebell, 2 Kan. App. 2d 99, 100, 101, 575 P.2d 574.

41. Subsection (a)(4) applied; order denying motion by wife to intervene in damage action for loss of consortium properly denied; 1976 amendment of K.S.A. 23-205 not prospective. Albertson v. Travis, 2 Kan. App. 2d 153, 576 P.2d 1090.

42. Order declaring impasse under Professional Negotiations Act not subject to appeal. In re NEA-Topeka, Inc., 224 Kan. 291, 292, 579 P.2d 1216. Opinion supplemented, 224 Kan. 582, 584, 581 P.2d 1187.

43. District court not authorized to reinstate dismissed action on own initiative. Brown v. Fitzpatrick, 224 Kan. 636, 638, 585 P.2d 987.

44. Referred to in directing district court judge to order commencement of impasse resolutions procedures. Garden City Educators' Ass'n v. Vance, 224 Kan. 732, 735, 585 P.2d 1057.

45. Cited in dissenting opinion; no final order entered by trial court. Brady v. Brady, 225 Kan. 485, 493, 592 P.2d 865.

46. Jurisdiction invoked hereunder from order initiated under K.S.A. 23-496; final decision. Brown v. Tubbs, 2 Kan. App. 2d 522, 523, 582 P.2d 1165.

47. Appeal from directed verdict in medical malpractice action; reversed; exclusion of proffered testimony. Moore v. Francisco, 2 Kan. App. 2d 526, 527, 583 P.2d 391.

48. Appellate jurisdiction matter of right in boundary line dispute when district court order involves title to real estate and has semblance of finality. State v. Williams, 3 Kan. App. 2d 205, 206, 592 P.2d 129.

49. Interlocutory appeal hereunder; denial of motion to dismiss in wrongful death action reversed; widow of deceased has exclusive right to bring action. Johnson v. McArthur, 226 Kan. 128, 129, 596 P.2d 148.

50. Appeal from trial court's finding of occurrence of prohibited practices during negotiations dismissed; moot. NEA-Topeka, Inc. v. U.S.D. No. 501, 227 Kan. 529, 531, 608 P.2d 920.

51. Judgment under K.S.A. 60-254(b) may not later be reviewed as intermediate ruling on appeal of final judgment of entire case. Dennis v. Southeastern Kansas Gas Co., 227 Kan. 872, 876, 878, 610 P.2d 627.

52. Any act or ruling from beginning of proceedings reviewable hereunder upon final decision in any action. Kauk v. First Nat'l Bank of Hoxie, 5 Kan. App. 2d 83, 89, 613 P.2d 670.

53. Creditor of insolvent corporation cannot maintain personal action on own behalf against directors or officers who breach duty by negligent mismanagement. Speer v. Dighton Grain, Inc., 229 Kan. 272, 277, 624 P.2d 952.

54. Debt collection agency is "supplier" within meaning of Consumer Protection Act. State, ex rel., Miller v. Midwest Service Bureau of Topeka, Inc., 229 Kan. 322, 623 P.2d 1343.

55. In multiple party suit where final judgment against one of parties is entered, appeal from such judgment may be taken as matter of right. Patterson v. Missouri Valley Steel, Inc., 229 Kan. 481, 483, 484, 625 P.2d 483.

56. Service upon resident agent of dissolved corporation during three year wind-up period constitutes valid service on corporation. Vogel v. Missouri Valley Steel, Inc., 229 Kan. 492, 493, 625 P.2d 1123.

57. Board of county commissioners is a proper party to an appeal by city from its order denying land annexation by city. Board of Johnson County Commissioners v. City of Lenexa, 230 Kan. 632, 634, 640 P.2d 1212 (1982).

58. Order disqualifying out-of-state attorney is final decision from which an appeal may be perfected hereunder. Skahan v. Powell, 8 Kan. App. 2d 204, 205, 206, 208, 653 P.2d 1192 (1982).

59. Action brought under Federal Employer's Liability Act; right of contribution against third-party tortfeasor allowed by K.S.A. 60-258a. Gaulden v. Burlington Northern, Inc., 232 Kan. 205, 210, 654 P.2d 383 (1982).

60. Cited in interlocutory appeal discussing royalty interests of certain natural gas leases. Matzen v. Cities Service Oil Co., 233 Kan. 846, 848, 667 P.2d 337 (1983).

61. Mentioned in holding maintenance of courthouse grounds governmental function; county immune from liability while K.S.A. 46-902 in effect. Griggs v. City of Goddard, 233 Kan. 915, 916, 666 P.2d 695 (1983).

62. Appeal time hereunder tolled by K.S.A. 60-2103(a) upon timely filing of postjudgment motion. Squires v. City of Salina, 9 Kan. App. 2d 199, 201, 675 P.2d 926 (1984).

63. Interlocutory appeal only permitted on matter determined by trial court (remote sellers-buyers; implied warranties-privity). Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp., 234 Kan. 742, 743, 757, 675 P.2d 887 (1984).

64. Absent exceptional circumstances, order remaining proceeding to KCC for further findings not appealable under (a)(4). Holton Transport, Inc. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n, 10 Kan. App. 2d 12, 13, 690 P.2d 399 (1984).

65. Legislature did not contemplate appeals in original eminent domain proceedings under (a)(3); not final under (a)(4). In re Condemnation of Land for State Highway Purposes, 235 Kan. 676, 682, 683 P.2d 247 (1984).

66. Order appealed from under subsection (b) must contain statutorily required findings as to need for appeal; corrected subsequent order does not extend appeal period. Razook v. Kemp, 236 Kan. 156, 159, 690 P.2d 376 (1984).

67. Issues of restraining order and temporary injunction moot on appeal of injunction issued thereafter. U.S.D. No. 503 v. McKinney, 236 Kan. 224, 228, 230, 689 P.2d 860 (1984).

68. Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeal of order terminating receivership. Oliver v. Roberts, 236 Kan. 384, 387, 690 P.2d 1363 (1984).

69. Cross-appeal must be perfected; mere notice not sufficient to present interlocutory appeal. Haas v. Freeman, 236 Kan. 677, 683, 693 P.2d 1199 (1985).

70. Cited; questions of counterclaim for malicious prosecution, fraudulent representation where no showing of reliance discussed. Hutchinson Travel Agency, Inc. v. McGregor, 10 Kan. App. 2d 461, 701 P.2d 977 (1985).

71. Cited; appeal of summary judgment for only one defendant where required certificate (K.S.A. 60-254(b)) not issued examined. Miller v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America, 11 Kan. App. 2d 91, 712 P.2d 1282 (1986).

72. Cited; sanctions imposed under K.S.A. 60-237 for failing to answer interrogatories (K.S.A. 60-233) not appealable as interlocutory orders. Reed v. Hess, 239 Kan. 46, 53, 716 P.2d 555 (1986).

73. Motion to amend (K.S.A. 60-259) to contain findings required in (b) must be filed and served within 10 days of filing of original order. Anderson v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 237 Kan. 336, 338, 699 P.2d 1023 (1985).

74. Noted; powers granted under K.S.A. 12-6a01 et seq. (general improvement and assessment law) examined. Madden v. City of Lenexa, 239 Kan. 397, 721 P.2d 261 (1986).

75. Cited; authority of securities commissioner to conduct evidentiary hearing under K.S.A. 17-1266a on permanent cease and desist order examined. Activator Supply Co. v. Wurth, 239 Kan. 610, 625, 722 P.2d 1081 (1986).

76. Cited; order of sale issued in mortgage foreclosure action as nonappealable order noted. Valley State Bank v. Geiger, 12 Kan. App. 2d 485, 748 P.2d 905 (1988).

77. Cited; order denying motion to compel arbitration (K.S.A. 5-402) appealable as a matter of right noted. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 12 Kan. App. 2d 546, 549, 751 P.2d 146 (1988).

78. Denial of motion to intervene in final order, appealable pursuant to K.S.A. 60-2103 and 60-258. Robertson v. Ludwig, 12 Kan. App. 2d 571, 583, 752 P.2d 690 (1988).

79. Cited; court recommendation of appeal involving foreclosure and sale of inventory allegedly seized by breach of peace noted. Riley State Bank v. Spillman, 242 Kan. 696, 699, 750 P.2d 1024 (1988).

80. Cited; tort action for retaliatory discharge-exception to employee-at-will doctrine, federal preemption in nuclear industry examined. Chrisman v. Philips Industries, Inc., 242 Kan. 772, 751 P.2d 140 (1988).

81. Cited; statutes (K.S.A. 60-3407, 60-3409, 60-3411) limiting recovery in medical malpractice actions as unconstitutional examined. Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. Bell, 243 Kan. 333, 335, 757 P.2d 251 (1988).

82. Cited; quashing of subpoena duces tecum, competency of expert witness, adopting findings of fact in another case as findings herein examined. Jones v. Bordman, 243 Kan. 444, 445, 759 P.2d 953 (1988).

83. Cited; appeal from in limine ruling on prohibition of evidence of certain damages in condemnation proceeding denied. Osborne v. City of Manhattan, 244 Kan. 107, 765 P.2d 1100 (1988).

84. Applicability of K.S.A. 77-201 Fourth to statutory authority governing Kansas parole board's power to grant or deny parole determined. Haney v. Hamilton, 13 Kan. App. 2d 269, 270, 768 P.2d 832 (1989).

85. Order extending statutory redemption period (K.S.A. 60-2414) as final appealable order determined. Federal Savings & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Treaster, 13 Kan. App. 2d 305, 307, 770 P.2d 481 (1989).

86. Provisions of K.S.A. 65-4904 relative to filing time for medical malpractice screening panel recommendations, tolling period of K.S.A. 65-4908 construed. White v. VinZant, 13 Kan. App. 2d 467, 469, 773 P.2d 1169 (1989).

87. Judicial discretion in disqualifying law firm a few days before pretrial and trial examined. Parker v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 245 Kan. 580, 781 P.2d 1099 (1989).

88. Evidence of nonuse or misuse of child safety restraining device (K.S.A. 8-1344) as inadmissible under K.S.A. 8-1345(d) examined. Watkins v. Hartsock, 245 Kan. 756, 757, 783 P.2d 1293 (1989).

89. Ruling on allowance for attorney fees as unnecessary before filing timely notice of appeal determined. Snodgrass v. State Farm Mut. Auto, Ins. Co., 246 Kan. 371, 372, 789 P.2d 211 (1990).

90. Denial of motion for summary judgment appealable when opposing party's motion for summary judgment granted. Southwest Nat'l Bank v. Simpson & Son, Inc., 14 Kan. App. 2d 763, 768, 799 P.2d 512 (1990).

91. Dissent's discussion on meaning of "final decision"; would make court's ruling on time for appeal retroactive. Evans v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 249 Kan. 248, 267, 815 P.2d 550 (1991).

92. Effect of partial adjudication of claims examined where final judgment not entered pursuant to K.S.A. 60-254(b); school's obligation to student considered. Honeycutt v. City of Wichita, 251 Kan. 451, 459, 836 P.2d 1128 (1992).

93. When Kansas Supreme Court rule 2.03 validates premature notice of appeal filed after motion to alter/amend but before motion denied examined. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Bopp, 251 Kan. 539, 541, 836 P.2d 1142 (1992).

94. Trial court's broad discretion regarding examination by a physician of a party whose condition is in dispute (K.S.A. 60-235) noted. Curry v. Klein, 251 Kan. 670, 671, 840 P.2d 443 (1992).

95. Cited in holding trial court's journal entry constituted consent decree between parties and was final order even though jurisdiction retained. Steele v. Guardianship & Conservatorship of Crist, 251 Kan. 712, 718, 840 P.2d 1107 (1992).

96. Appeals to court of appeals from district court's final decision except where direct appeals to supreme court required examined. In re T.D.W., 18 Kan. App. 2d 286, 289, 850 P.2d 947 (1993).

97. Cited; whether court erred by disqualifying counsel without hearing or investigation examined. LeaseAmerica Corp. v. Stewart, 19 Kan. App. 2d 740, 743, 876 P.2d 184 (1994).

98. An order denying an application to intervene is a final appealable order. In re Marriage of Osborne, 21 Kan. App. 2d 374, 376, 901 P.2d 12 (1995).

99. Appeal under subsection (a)(2) improper; order does not grant injunctive or quo warranto relief; appeal to wrong court. State ex rel. Board of Healing Arts v. Beyrle, 262 Kan. 507, 941 P.2d 371 (1997).

100. Appeal of final judgment on less than all claims in multiple claim action precluded appellate review. Gillespie v. Seymour, 263 Kan. 650, 654, 952 P.2d 1313 (1998).

101. Trial court consideration of untimely interlocutory appeal not an abuse of discretion. Adams v. St. Francis Regional Med. Center, 264 Kan. 144, 145, 150, 955 P.2d 1169 (1998).

102. Claims based on parole officer's failure to disclose parolee's criminal history to employer resulting in death of employee dismissed. Schmidt v. HTG, Inc., 265 Kan. 372, 378, 961 P.2d 177 (1998).

103. Supreme court has jurisdiction under (a)(4) in conversion of forged instrument case transferred under K.S.A. 20-3018(c). King v. White, 265 Kan. 627, 632, 962 P.2d 475 (1998).

104. Order disqualifying counsel from joint representation of multiple criminal defendants is not an appealable order. State v. Donahue, 25 Kan. App. 2d 480, 482, 967 P.2d 335 (1998).

105. Appeal is dismissed; plaintiff's motion to dismiss was approved, with conditions; dismissal is not a final order; conditions are not reviewable unless action is refiled. Brower v. Bartel, 268 Kan. 43, 46, 990 P.2d 1235 (1999).

106. Trial court order dismissing termination of parental rights is appealable under collateral order doctrine. In re C.H.W., 26 Kan. App. 2d 413, 416, 988 P.2d 276 (1999).

107. Appeals court has jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeal concerning whether attorney fee statements are privileged. Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland Park, 268 Kan. 407, 409, 413, 997 P.2d 681 (2000).

108. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss action without prejudice granted when plaintiff's doctor didn't qualify as expert; court's ruling is not a final order subject to appeal. Bain v. Artzer, 271 Kan. 578, 25 P.3d 136 (2001).

109. In legal malpractice action, trial court's ultimate sanction against defendant's defense team of default judgment is reversed and remanded. Canaan v. Bartee, 272 Kan. 720, 35 P.3d 841 (2001).

110. Kansas follows rule that law of state where tort occurred should apply (Mexico in this case); limitations on damages do not violate "strong public policy". Raskin v. Allison, 30 Kan. App. 2d 1240, 57 P.3d 30 (2002).

111. Lack of final judgment results in appellate court having no jurisdiction over matter. Arnold v. Hewitt, 32 Kan. App. 2d 500, 85 P.3d 220 (2004).

112. Denial of motion for partial summary judgment is not a final judgment but is reviewable under section. Roy v. Young, 278 Kan. 244, 93 P.3d 712 (2004).

113. Court has discretion to act on interlocutory appeal. Rodriguez-Tocker v. Estate of Tocker, 35 Kan. App. 2d 15, 129 P.3d 586 (2006).

114. Order disqualifying counsel not final decision under subsection (a)(4) for purposes of appellate jurisdiction. Flores Rentals v. Flores, 283 Kan. 476, 491, 153 P.3d 523 (2007).

115. Cited in dissent objecting to interlocutory appeal which results in piecemeal appeals. Williams v. Lawton, 38 Kan. App. 2d 565, 170 P.3d 414 (2007).

116. State has a right to appeal court's K.S.A. 60-1507 action under K.S.A. 60-2102(a)(4); K.S.A. 22-3602(b) not applicable in this case. McHenry v. State, 39 Kan. App. 2d 117, 119, 177 P.3d 981 (2008).

117. Interlocutory appeal on ownership question involving coalbed methane gas granted by Supreme Court. Central Natural Resources v. Davis Operating Co., 288 Kan. 234, 201 P.3d 680 (2009).

118. Appeal of denial of motion to stay eminent domain jury trial, district court did not lose jurisdiction. Harsch v. Miller, 288 Kan. 280, 200 P.3d 467 (2009).

119. Certified questions were inextricably intertwined with question of whether new trial was proper. Williams v. Lawton, 288 Kan. 768, 207 P.3d 1027 (2009).

120. District court's K.S.A. 60-1507 order vacating criminal convictions terminates civil case at the district court. Moll v. State, 41 Kan. App. 2d 677, 204 P.3d 659 (2009).

121. Discussion of appeal rights under chapter 60 versus the more liberal appeal rights under chapter 59. In re Adoption of A.A.T., 42 Kan. App. 2d 1, 210 P.3d 640 (2009).

122. Plaintiff's appeal not authorized on procedural grounds. Kansas Medical Mut. Ins. Co. v. Svaty, 291 Kan. 597, 244 P.3d 642 (2010).

123. Appellant did not appeal from a "final decision" and the court lacked statutory authority to hear the appeal. In re T.S.W., 294 Kan. 423, 276 P.3d 133 (2012).

124. Court of appeals properly exercised pendent jurisdiction to include the district court's conditional order as part of the appeal. City of Neodesha v. BP Corporation, 295 Kan. 298, 287 P.3d 214 (2012).

125. Appellate court lacked jurisdiction where district court did not resolve issue of medical expenses reimbursement and the district court did not enter a "final decision." Kaelter v. Sokol, 301 Kan. 247, 250, 340 P.3d 1210 (2015).

126. There is no statutory right to appeal the dismissal of a request for a medical malpractice screening panel. Macias v. Correct Care Solutions, Inc., 52 Kan. App. 2d 400, 409, 367 P.3d 311 (2016).

This website has moved to KSRevisor.gov