Printable Format65-1006.
History: L. 1901, ch. 254, § 7; L. 1913, ch. 290, § 11; R.S. 1923, 65-1006; Repealed, L. 1957, ch. 343, § 91; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Suit for medical services; allegations of authority insufficient. Westbrook v. Nelson, 64 Kan. 436, 67 P. 884.
2. Prosecution for practicing without authority; allegations and proof. State v. Huff, 75 Kan. 585, 90 P. 279.
3. Sufficiency of information in prosecution under this section. State v. Buis, 83 Kan. 273, 111 P. 189.
4. Section applies to chiropractors; act constitutional. State v. Johnson, 84 Kan. 411, 414, 114 P. 390.
5. Section penalizes each specific act of practice. State v. Cotner, 87 Kan. 864, 866, 127 P. 1.
6. Appointment of board of chiropractic examiners; mandamus. Green v. Hodges, 91 Kan. 658, 660, 138 P. 605.
7. K.S.A. 65-1011 authorizing injunction against unlawful practice of medicine is valid. State, ex rel., v. Cooper, 147 Kan. 710, 712, 714, 716, 78 P.2d 884.
8. Practice of medicine and surgery and osteopathy discussed and distinguished. State, ex rel., v. Gleason, 148 Kan. 1, 6, 8, 14, 79 P.2d 911. Rehearing denied: 148 Kan. 458, 84 P.2d 48. Opinion on post-decision motions: 148 Kan. 459, 83 P.2d 425.
9. Action to enjoin from illegal practice properly maintained by county attorney. State, ex rel., v. Leopold, 170 Kan. 613, 615, 228 P.2d 538.