Printable Format75-5262.
History: L. 1973, ch. 339, § 53; L. 1975, ch. 459, § 2; L. 1978, ch. 368, § 3; L. 1989, ch. 92, § 5; L. 1990, ch. 322, § 4; L. 1990, ch. 309, § 70; L. 1991, ch. 260, § 13; Repealed, L. 2012, ch. 148, § 4; July 1.
Source or prior law:
76-24a03.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Failure to require presentence investigation for defendant sentenced under 21-4618 not prejudicial error. State v. Korbel, 231 K. 657, 664, 647 P.2d 1301 (1982).
2. While sentencing court can make recommendations regarding rehabilitation (21-4620), secretary of corrections determines where sentence will be served. State v. Bennett, 240 K. 575, 577, 731 P.2d 284 (1987).
3. Exculpatory value of seven-year-old psychiatric report examined. State v. Smith, 245 K. 381, 388, 781 P.2d 666 (1989).
4. Mandate in 1989 Supp. 21-4603(3)(a) (now 1990 Supp. 21-4603(4)(a)) regarding sentence modification examined in depth; held constitutional. State v. Reed, 248 K. 792, 802, 811 P.2d 1163 (1991).
5. District courts may not deny defendant's motion to modify sentence absent evaluation pursuant to 75-5220 and hereunder. State v. Tillman, 18 K.A.2d 556, 858 P.2d 1219 (1993).
6. Whether court abused discretion in denying defendant's motion to modify without correctional evaluation recommendations examined. State v. Goseland, 256 K. 729, 742, 887 P.2d 1109 (1994).