Printable Format75-52,118.
History: L. 1986, ch. 327, § 1; Repealed, L. 2004, ch. 121, § 12; July 1.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Constitutional Law: Kansans Have No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Bank or Telephone Records [State v. Schultz, 850 P.2d 818 (Kan. 1993)]," Kyle Steadman, 33 W.L.J. 466 (1994).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Conviction of theft by deception; privacy rights in bank and telephone records, elements of conspiracy, sufficiency of information, deposition testimony at trial considered and determined. State v. Schultz, 252 K. 819, 821, 850 P.2d 818 (1993).