7-121b. (a) Subject to subsection (b) of K.S.A. 40-3411, and amendments thereto, whenever a civil action is commenced by filing a petition or whenever a pleading states a claim in a district court for damages for personal injuries or death arising out of the rendering of or the failure to render professional services by any health care provider, compensation for reasonable attorney fees to be paid by each litigant in the action shall be approved by the judge after an evidentiary hearing and prior to final disposition of the case by the district court. Compensation for reasonable attorney fees for services performed in an appeal of a judgment in any such action to the court of appeals shall be approved after an evidentiary hearing by the chief judge or by the presiding judge of the panel hearing the case. Compensation for reasonable attorney fees for services performed in an appeal of a judgment in any such action to the supreme court shall be approved after an evidentiary hearing by the departmental justice for the department in which the appeal originated. In determining the reasonableness of such compensation, the judge or justice shall consider the following:
(1) The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly.
(2) The likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the attorney.
(3) The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services.
(4) The amount involved and the results obtained.
(5) The time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances.
(6) The nature and length of the professional relationship with the client.
(7) The experience, reputation and ability of the attorney or attorneys performing the services.
(8) Whether the fee is fixed or contingent.
(b) As used in this section:
(1) "Health care provider" means a person licensed to practice any branch of the healing arts, a person who holds a temporary permit to practice any branch of the healing arts, a person engaged in a postgraduate training program approved by the state board of healing arts, a licensed medical care facility, a health maintenance organization, a licensed dentist, a licensed professional nurse, a licensed practical nurse, a licensed optometrist, a licensed podiatrist, a licensed pharmacist, a professional corporation organized pursuant to the professional corporation law of Kansas by persons who are authorized by such law to form such a corporation and who are health care providers as defined by this subsection, a licensed physical therapist or an officer, employee or agent thereof acting in the course and scope of such person's employment or agency; and
(2) "professional services" means those services which require licensure, registration or certification by agencies of the state for the performance thereof.
History: L. 1976, ch. 248, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 231, § 2; L. 1986, ch. 229, § 22; L. 1986, ch. 10, § 1; L. 1988, ch. 246, § 10; L. 1994, ch. 181, § 2; L. 2003, ch. 128, § 15; April 1, 2004.
Law Review and Bar Journal References:
"Recent Legislation: The Kansas Approach to Medical Malpractice," Nancy Neal Scherer and Robert P. Scherer, 16 W.L.J. 395, 416, 417 (1977).
"Countersuit: A Viable Alternative for the Wrongfully Sued Physician?," Stephen W. Cavanaugh, 19 W.L.J. 450, 462 (1980).
"The Kansas Perspective—Countering Frivolous Malpractice Suits," John C. Peck, J.D., and Carl C. Peck, M.D., 81 J.K.M.S. 512, 517 (1980).
"Medical Malpractice—The Kansas Law," Wayne T. Stratton, J.D., 81 J.K.M.S. 505, 508 (1980).
"Medical Malpractice Legislation: The Kansas Response to the Medical Malpractice Crisis," Karen Wedel and Jerome Weber, 23 W.L.J. 566, 569, 598 (1984).
"Caps, 'Crisis,' and Constitutionality—Evaluating the 1986 Kansas Medical Malpractice Legislation," Elizabeth Schartz, 35 K.L.R. 763, 777 (1987).
"Medical Malpractice in the 1990s: A Review of Changes in the Last Decade," Michael Sexton and Mark Sachse, J.K.T.L.A. Vol. XV, No. 4, 10, 11 (1992).
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Legislative limitation on recovery of noneconomic damages (K.S.A. 60-19a01, 60-19a02) as not violating any constitutional rights determined. Samuel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc., 246 Kan. 336, 340, 789 P.2d 541 (1990).
2. District court did not abuse discretion in utilizing hourly rate to reduce attorney fees contemplated by settlement agreement. Bhatlacharya v. Copple, 898 F.2d 766 (1990).
LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL
12/17/2024
Meeting Notice
12/02/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda 11/14/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda 10/23/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda 09/09/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda 08/21/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda LCC Policies REVISOR OF STATUTES
Chapter 72 Statute Transfer List
Kansas School Equity & Enhancement Act Gannon v. State A Summary of Special Sessions in Kansas Bill Brief for Senate Bill No. 1 Bill Brief for House Bill No. 2001 2024 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By Bill 2024 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By KSA 2023 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By Bill 2023 New, Amended & Repealed Statutes By KSA USEFUL LINKS
Session Laws
OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES
Kansas LegislatureAdministrative Services Division of Post Audit Research Department |