8-123.
History: L. 1913, ch. 65, § 8; R.S. 1923, § 8-123; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-2205; July 1.
Source or prior law:
L. 1903, ch. 67, §§ 3, 6, 7.
Cross References to Related Sections:
Later act, see 8-1516.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Duty of driver to look ahead for other vehicles. McDonald v. Yoder, 80 Kan. 25, 101 P. 468.
2. Driver presumed to have seen what he could have seen. McDonald v. Yoder, 80 Kan. 25, 101 P. 468.
3. Question whether driver guilty of negligence question for jury. Super v. Modell Township, 88 Kan. 698, 702, 129 P. 1162.
4. Rules applicable to drivers with reference to rights of others. Super v. Modell Township, 88 Kan. 698, 702, 129 P. 1162.
5. Duties of drivers of automobiles and of other vehicles considered. Arrington v. Horner, 88 Kan. 817, 820, 129 P. 1159.
6. Duty of driver of automobile on meeting other vehicle considered. Arrington v. Horner, 88 Kan. 817, 820, 129 P. 1159.
7. "Look out," held not a request to stop automobile. Sterner v. Issitt, 89 Kan. 357, 131 P. 551.
8. Duty of driver of automobile in presence of frightened horse. Ellsworth v. Jarvis, 92 Kan. 895, 141 P. 1135.
9. Driving on left side of highway not necessarily negligent. Giles v. Ternes, 93 Kan. 140, 143 P. 491.
10. Collision with buggy; contributory negligence of motorists considered. Giles v. Ternes, 93 Kan. 140, 143 P. 491.
11. Duty of motorists in use of highway considered. Giles v. Ternes, 93 Kan. 140, 143 P. 491.
12. Sufficiency of information under this act considered. The State v. Pfeifer, 96 Kan. 791, 153 P. 552.
13. Information charging merely excessive speed fails to charge public offense. The State v. Pfeifer, 96 Kan. 791, 153 P. 552.
14. Motorist may exceed eight miles in passing other vehicles. The State v. Pfeifer, 96 Kan. 791, 793, 794, 153 P. 552.
15. Negligence question of fact when automobile passes other vehicle. Pens v. Kreitzer, 98 Kan. 759, 160 P. 200.
16. Instructions and arguments of counsel concerning this section considered. Rudy v. Headley, 103 Kan. 417, 418, 173 P. 913.
17. Automobile and horse-drawn cart; collision; negligence; duties of parties. Tucker v. Lyons, 111 Kan. 741, 743, 208 P. 547.
18. Duty of each vehicle to turn out of road, considered. Tucker v. Lyons, 111 Kan. 741, 743, 208 P. 547.
19. Rules of passing on left recognized, but evidence does not justify. Turner v. George Rushton Baking Co., 135 Kan. 484, 487, 11 P.2d 746.
20. Section held not to apply when horses being passed are entirely off slab. Thornton v. Franse, 135 Kan. 782, 783, 12 P.2d 728.
21. Cited in ruling on demurrer in civil damage action. Knight v. Hackett, 149 Kan. 492, 495, 87 P.2d 505.
22. Cited; failure of brakes not negligence per se. Calnon v. Cook, 178 Kan. 517, 518, 289 P.2d 731.
|
|