Printable Format8-566.
History: L. 1937, ch. 283, § 66; L. 1957, ch. 63, § 1; L. 1961, ch. 55, § 1; L. 1970, ch. 54, § 14; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-2205; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Evidence of noncompliance with statute sufficient to go to jury. In re Estate of Modlin, 172 Kan. 428, 434, 443, 241 P.2d 692.
2. Wisdom of statute discussed in wrongful death action; legislative policy. In re Estate of Modlin, 172 Kan. 428, 434, 443, 241 P.2d 692.
3. Presumption statute complied with; evidence of noncompliance sufficient to go to jury. Chicago, Rock Island & P.R. Co. v. Consumers Coop. Ass'n., 180 F.2d 900, 901, 902, 905.
4. Not error for court to include provisions of section in jury instructions; contributory negligence does not automatically result from failure to stop, unless such failure is direct and proximate cause of accident, which is a jury question. Williams v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 204 Kan. 772, 779, 465 P.2d 975.