Printable Format8-586.
History: L. 1937, ch. 283, § 86; L. 1961, ch. 56, § 1; Repealed, L. 1974, ch. 33, § 8-2205; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Fact city had no ordinance excusing compliance herewith mentioned. Schoonover v. Clark, 155 Kan. 835, 836, 130 P.2d 619.
2. Violation of statute may or may not amount to contributory negligence. Rohrer v. Olson, 172 Kan. 674, 677, 678, 242 P.2d 825.
3. Provisions of section properly stated in instructions to jury. Dorssom v. Kansas Power and Light Co., 174 Kan. 472, 478, 257 P.2d 151.
4. Cited in holding petition in damage action stated cause of action. Thomas v. Morehead, 175 Kan. 74, 75, 259 P.2d 195.
5. Petition alleged section violated, emergency existed, sustaining demurrer error. Winfough v. Tri-State Insurance Co., 179 Kan. 525, 531, 297 P.2d 159.
6. Allegations of negligence and last clear chance doctrine proper in same petition. Gibbs v. Mikesell, 183 Kan. 123, 125, 325 P.2d 359.
7. Damage action for personal injuries; trial court's instructions as to violation of this and other sections not erroneous. Kline v. Ash, 188 Kan. 745, 747, 366 P.2d 276.
8. Damage action for personal injuries; statute not violated; negligence. Young v. Johnson, 286 F.2d 365, 366.
9. Mentioned; proximate cause is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury. Deemer v. Reichart, 195 Kan. 232, 239, 404 P.2d 174.