Printable Format8-1020. Administrative hearing; requirements; procedure. (a) Any licensee served with an officer's certification and notice of suspension pursuant to K.S.A. 8-1002, and amendments thereto, may request an administrative hearing. Such request may be made either by:
(1) Mailing a written request which is postmarked 14 days after service of notice; or
(2) transmitting a written request by electronic facsimile which is received by the division within 14 days after service of notice.
(b) If the licensee makes a timely request for an administrative hearing and makes a timely payment of the required hearing fee, any temporary license issued pursuant to K.S.A. 8-1002, and amendments thereto, shall remain in effect until the 30th day after the effective date of the decision made by the division.
(c) If the licensee fails to make a timely request for an administrative hearing together with the required hearing fee, the licensee's driving privileges shall be suspended or suspended and then restricted in accordance with the notice of suspension served pursuant to K.S.A. 8-1002, and amendments thereto.
(d) (1) Upon receipt of a timely request for a hearing together with the required hearing fee, the division shall forthwith set the matter for hearing before a representative of the director and provide notice of the extension of temporary driving privileges. The hearing shall be held by telephone conference call unless the hearing request includes a request that the hearing be held in person before a representative of the director. The officer's certification and notice of suspension shall inform the licensee of the availability of a hearing before a representative of the director. Except for a hearing conducted by telephone conference call, the hearing shall be conducted in the county where the arrest occurred or a county adjacent thereto.
(2) The division shall charge a fee of $50 for a hearing, to be paid within the time period for making a timely request for a hearing, whether held by telephone or in person, to be applied by the division for administrative costs to conduct the hearing. The division shall remit all hearing fees to the state treasurer in accordance with the provisions of K.S.A. 75-4215, and amendments thereto. Upon receipt of each such remittance, the state treasurer shall deposit the entire amount in the state treasury to the credit of the division of vehicles operating fund. The hearing fee established in this section shall be the only fee collected or moneys in the nature of a fee collected for such hearing. Such fee shall only be established by an act of the legislature and no other authority is established by law or otherwise to collect a fee.
(e) Except as provided in subsection (f), prehearing discovery shall be limited to the following documents, which shall be provided to the licensee or the licensee's attorney no later than seven days prior to the date of hearing:
(1) The officer's certification and notice of suspension;
(2) in the case of a breath or blood test failure, copies of documents indicating the result of any evidentiary breath or blood test administered at the request of a law enforcement officer;
(3) in the case of a breath test failure, a copy of the affidavit showing certification of the officer and the instrument; and
(4) in the case of a breath test failure, a copy of the Kansas department of health and environment testing protocol checklist.
(f) At or prior to the time the notice of hearing is sent, the division shall issue an order allowing the licensee or the licensee's attorney to review any law enforcement report and video or audio tape record made of the events upon which the administrative action is based. Such review shall take place at a reasonable time designated by the law enforcement agency and shall be made at the location where the law enforcement report or video or audio tape is kept. The licensee may obtain a copy of any such law enforcement report or video or audio tape upon request and upon payment of a reasonable fee to the law enforcement agency, not to exceed $25 per tape or $.25 per page of the law enforcement report.
(g) Witnesses at the hearing shall be limited to the licensee, to any law enforcement officer who signed the certification form and to one other witness who was present at the time of the issuance of the certification and called by the licensee. The presence of the certifying officer or officers shall not be required, unless requested by the licensee at the time of making the request for the hearing. The examination of a law enforcement officer shall be restricted to the factual circumstances relied upon in the officer's certification.
(h) (1) If the officer certifies that the person refused the test, the scope of the hearing shall be limited to whether:
(A) A law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating or attempting to operate a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or both, or had been driving a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in K.S.A. 8-2,128, and amendments thereto, while having alcohol or other drugs in such person's system or was under the age of 21 years and was operating or attempting to operate a vehicle while having alcohol or other drugs in such person's system;
(B) the person was in custody or arrested or was involved in a vehicle accident or collision resulting in property damage, personal injury or death;
(C) a law enforcement officer had presented the person with the oral and written notice required by K.S.A. 8-1001, and amendments thereto; and
(D) the person refused to submit to and complete a test as requested by a law enforcement officer.
(2) If the officer certifies that the person failed a breath test, the scope of the hearing shall be limited to whether:
(A) A law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or both, or had been driving a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in K.S.A. 8-2,128, and amendments thereto, while having alcohol or other drugs in such person's system or was under the age of 21 years and was operating or attempting to operate a vehicle while having alcohol or other drugs in such person's system;
(B) the person was in custody or arrested or was involved in a vehicle accident or collision resulting in property damage, personal injury or death;
(C) a law enforcement officer had presented the person with the oral and written notice required by K.S.A. 8-1001, and amendments thereto;
(D) the testing equipment used was certified by the Kansas department of health and environment;
(E) the person who operated the testing equipment was certified by the Kansas department of health and environment;
(F) the testing procedures used substantially complied with the procedures set out by the Kansas department of health and environment;
(G) the test result determined that the person had an alcohol concentration of .08 or greater in such person's breath; and
(H) the person was operating or attempting to operate a vehicle.
(3) If the officer certifies that the person failed a blood test, the scope of the hearing shall be limited to whether:
(A) A law enforcement officer had reasonable grounds to believe the person was operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or both, or had been driving a commercial motor vehicle, as defined in K.S.A. 8-2,128, and amendments thereto, while having alcohol or other drugs in such person's system or was under the age of 21 years and was operating or attempting to operate a vehicle while having alcohol or other drugs in such person's system;
(B) the person was in custody or arrested or was involved in a vehicle accident or collision resulting in property damage, personal injury or death;
(C) a law enforcement officer had presented the person with the oral and written notice required by K.S.A. 8-1001, and amendments thereto;
(D) the testing equipment used was reliable;
(E) the person who operated the testing equipment was qualified;
(F) the testing procedures used were reliable;
(G) the test result determined that the person had an alcohol concentration of .08 or greater in such person's blood; and
(H) the person was operating or attempting to operate a vehicle.
(i) At a hearing pursuant to this section, or upon court review of an order entered at such a hearing, an affidavit of the custodian of records at the Kansas department of health and environment stating that the breath testing device was certified and the operator of such device was certified on the date of the test shall be admissible into evidence in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if the certifying officer or employee of the Kansas department of health and environment had testified in person. A certified operator of a breath testing device shall be competent to testify regarding the proper procedures to be used in conducting the test.
(j) At a hearing pursuant to this section, or upon court review of an order entered at such a hearing, in which the report of blood test results have been prepared by the Kansas bureau of investigation or other forensic laboratory of a state or local law enforcement agency are to be introduced as evidence, the report, or a copy of the report, of the findings of the forensic examiner shall be admissible into evidence in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if the forensic examiner who performed such examination, analysis, comparison or identification and prepared the report thereon had testified in person.
(k) At the hearing, the licensee has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to show that the facts set out in the officer's certification are false or insufficient and that the order suspending or suspending and restricting the licensee's driving privileges should be dismissed.
(l) Evidence at the hearing shall be limited to the following:
(1) The documents set out in subsection (e);
(2) the testimony of the licensee;
(3) the testimony of any certifying officer;
(4) the testimony of any witness present at the time of the issuance of the certification and called by the licensee;
(5) any affidavits submitted from other witnesses;
(6) any documents submitted by the licensee to show the existence of a medical condition, as described in K.S.A. 8-1001, and amendments thereto; and
(7) any video or audio tape record of the events upon which the administrative action is based.
(m) After the hearing, the representative of the director shall enter an order affirming the order of suspension or suspension and restriction of driving privileges or for good cause appearing therefor, dismiss the administrative action. If the representative of the director enters an order affirming the order of suspension or suspension and restriction of driving privileges, the suspension or suspension and restriction shall begin on the 30th day after the effective date of the order of suspension or suspension and restriction. If the person whose privileges are suspended is a nonresident licensee, the license of the person shall be forwarded to the appropriate licensing authority in the person's state of residence if the result at the hearing is adverse to such person or if no timely request for a hearing is received.
(n) The representative of the director may issue an order at the close of the hearing or may take the matter under advisement and issue a hearing order at a later date. If the order is made at the close of the hearing, the licensee or the licensee's attorney shall be served with a copy of the order by the representative of the director. If the matter is taken under advisement or if the hearing was by telephone conference call, the licensee and any attorney who appeared at the administrative hearing upon behalf of the licensee each shall be served with a copy of the hearing order by mail. Any law enforcement officer who appeared at the hearing also may be mailed a copy of the hearing order. The effective date of the hearing order shall be the date upon which the hearing order is served, whether served in person or by mail.
(o) The licensee may file a petition for review of the hearing order pursuant to K.S.A. 8-259, and amendments thereto. Upon filing a petition for review, the licensee shall serve the secretary of revenue with a copy of the petition and summons. Upon receipt of a copy of the petition for review by the secretary, the temporary license issued pursuant to subsection (b) shall be extended until the decision on the petition for review is final.
(p) Such review shall be in accordance with this section and the Kansas judicial review act. To the extent that this section and any other provision of law conflicts, this section shall prevail. The petition for review shall be filed within 14 days after the effective date of the order. Venue of the action for review is the county where the person was arrested or the accident occurred, or, if the hearing was not conducted by telephone conference call, the county where the administrative proceeding was held. The action for review shall be by trial de novo to the court and the evidentiary restrictions of subsection (l) shall not apply to the trial de novo. The court shall take testimony, examine the facts of the case and determine whether the petitioner is entitled to driving privileges or whether the petitioner's driving privileges are subject to suspension or suspension and restriction under the provisions of this act. Notwithstanding K.S.A. 77-617, and amendments thereto, the court: (1) May also consider and determine any constitutional issue, including, but not limited to, the lawfulness of the law enforcement encounter, even if such issue was not raised before the agency; and (2) shall also consider and determine any constitutional issue, including, but not limited to, the lawfulness of the law enforcement encounter, if such issue is raised by the petitioner in the petition for review, even if such issue was not raised before the agency. If the court finds that the grounds for action by the agency have been met, the court shall affirm.
(q) Upon review, the licensee shall have the burden to show that the decision of the agency should be set aside.
(r) Notwithstanding the requirement to issue a temporary license in K.S.A. 8-1002, and amendments thereto, and the requirements to extend the temporary license in this section, any such temporary driving privileges are subject to restriction, suspension, revocation or cancellation as provided in K.S.A. 8-1014, and amendments thereto, or for other cause.
(s) Upon motion by a party, or on the court's own motion, the court may enter an order restricting the driving privileges allowed by the temporary license provided for in K.S.A. 8-1002, and amendments thereto, and in this section. The temporary license also shall be subject to restriction, suspension, revocation or cancellation, as set out in K.S.A. 8-1014, and amendments thereto, or for other cause.
(t) The facts found by the hearing officer or by the district court upon a petition for review shall be independent of the determination of the same or similar facts in the adjudication of any criminal charges arising out of the same occurrence. The disposition of those criminal charges shall not affect the suspension or suspension and restriction to be imposed under this section.
(u) All notices affirming or canceling a suspension under this section, all notices of a hearing held under this section and all issuances of temporary driving privileges pursuant to this section shall be sent by first-class mail and a United States post office certificate of mailing shall be obtained therefor. All notices so mailed shall be deemed received three days after mailing, except that this provision shall not apply to any licensee where such application would result in a manifest injustice.
(v) The provisions of K.S.A. 60-206, and amendments thereto, regarding the computation of time shall be applicable in determining the time for requesting an administrative hearing as set out in subsection (a) and to the time for filing a petition for review pursuant to subsection (o) and K.S.A. 8-259, and amendments thereto.
History: L. 2001, ch. 200, § 1; L. 2007, ch. 181, § 6; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 6; L. 2011, ch. 105, § 17; L. 2012, ch. 172, § 18; L. 2013, ch. 122, § 4; L. 2016, ch. 69, § 2; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Service of summons not required; court has jurisdiction if licensee files timely appeal and mails a copy to KDR. Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 32 Kan. App. 2d 763, 88 P.3d 1236 (2004).
2. When petition for review of administrative order is pending in district court, administrative sanction is suspended until review is completed. In re Driving Privileges of G.L. Mundhenke, 33 Kan. App. 2d 237, 99 P.3d 1141 (2004).
3. Person appealing driver's license suspension must serve the secretary of revenue with copy of petition and summons. Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 270 Kan. 83, 106 P.3d 492 (2005).
4. Section in limiting witnesses at administrative hearing not violative of due process. Cross v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 279 Kan. 501, 110 P.3d 438 (2005).
5. Arresting officer had probable cause to stop vehicle and reasonable cause to believe vehicle operator was DUI. Butcher v. Kansas Dept of Revenue, 34 Kan. App. 2d 826, 124 P.3d 1078 (2005).
6. Evidentiary restrictions at administrative hearing level inapplicable at district court de novo appeal level where meaningful due process rights protected. Kempke v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 281 Kan. 770, 782, 800, 133 P.3d 104 (2006).
7. Plain language of subsection (h) limits the scope of an administrative driver's license suspension hearing to the issues delineated in the statute. Martin v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 36 Kan. App. 2d 561, 566, 142 P.3d 735 (2006).
8. Mentioned; documents showing certification or calibration of breath test machine or operator do not implicate 6 th amendment confrontation clause. State v. Dukes, 38 Kan. App. 2d 958, 962, 174 P.3d 914 (2008).
9. Section is unambiguous; list of issues that may be decided in administrative driver's license suspension hearing is exclusive. Martin v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 285 Kan. 625, 627, 630-633, 176 P.3d 938 (2008).
10. Petition for judicial review held to comply with pleading requirements of K.S.A. 77-614(b). Kingsley v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 288 Kan. 390, 204 P.3d 562 (2009).
11. Ten-day limit for filing petition for review per K.S.A. 8-259 applies to every order of suspension issued pursuant to K.S.A. 8-1001 et seq. Moser v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 289 Kan. 513, 213 P.3d 1061 (2009).
12. Breath test failed to substantially comply with KDHE protocol. Mitchell v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 41 Kan. App. 2d 114, 200 P.3d 496 (2009).
13. Pleading requirements under K.S.A. 77-614 discussed and applied in driver's license suspension proceeding. Rivera v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 41 Kan. App. 2d 949, 206 P.3d 891 (2009).
14. Administrative hearing officer lacked statutory authority to consider whether breath testing equipment used on motorist was improperly certified; certification of breath testing equipment not precluded by failure to comply with certification standard "each calendar week." Barnett v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 44 Kan. App. 2d 498, 238 P.3d 324 (2010).
15. Driver has the initial evidentiary burden to show that the person who drew his blood was not qualified. Henke v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 45 Kan. App. 2d 8, 246 P.3d 408 (2010).
16. Trial court was not authorized to dismiss order suspending motorist's driver's license. Juenemann v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 46 Kan. App. 2d 1, 257 P.3d 346 (2010).
17. Driver's consumption of alcohol after driving but before submitting to a breath test may be a relevant factor. Katz v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 45 Kan. App. 2d 877, 256 P.3d 876 (2011).
18. Seven-month delay between motorist's request for in-person administrative review of driver's license suspension and hearing did not warrant vacatur of suspension based on statutory requirement that Kansas Department of Revenue schedule hearing "forthwith." Crawford v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 46 Kan. App. 2d 464, 263 P.3d 828 (2011).
19. Evidence of post-driving alcohol consumption may be considered in driver licensee's suspension proceeding to evaluate whether police officer had statutory reasonable grounds. Swank v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 294 Kan. 871, 281 P.3d 135 (2012).
20. Hearing officer has no authority to sua sponte reverse a decision dismissing a license suspension hearing once a final order has been entered. Pearson v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 56 Kan. App. 2d 369, 381, 430 P.3d 475, 485 (2018).
21. Upon judicial review of an administrative suspension of a driver's license, a court can consider constitutional issues surrounding the incident. Jarvis v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 56 Kan. App. 2d 1081, 442 P.3d 1054 (2019).
22. Without an indigency exception, the filing fee requirement to obtain a due process hearing is facially unconstitutional, and the remedy is a refund of the fee. Creecy v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 310 Kan. 454, 466, 447 P.3d 959 (2019).
23. An officer had reasonable grounds to request a breath test where the officer did not ignore evidence of post-driving alcohol consumption. Rosendahl v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 310 Kan. 474, 484, 447 P.3d 347 (2019).
24. The 2016 amendment to K.S.A. 8-1020(p) provided courts statutory authority to consider and determine the constitutionality of an encounter with law enforcement without resorting to the exclusionary rule. Whigham v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 312 Kan. 147, 152, 473 P.3d 881 (2020).
25. Section provides a remedy of setting aside a driver's license suspension order for any reason within a court's review, including the constitutionality or lawfulness of the law enforcement encounter. Jarvis v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 312 Kan. 156, 473 P.3d 869 (2020).
26. The state can prove reasonable grounds by using a completed DC-27 form, or through competent testimony, or both. Technical errors such as checking or not checking a particular box on a DC-27 form do not bar the form's use as evidence. Davis v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 64 Kan. App. 2d 107, 113, 547 P.3d 588 (2024).