Printable Format8-1336.
History: L. 1974, ch. 29, § 3; L. 1975, ch. 427, § 15; L. 1976, ch. 40, § 5; L. 1987, ch. 46, § 1; Repealed, L. 1996, ch. 15, § 11; March 7.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Statutes providing for 55 mile an hour speed limit are not unconstitutional as delegation of legislative powers; alternative provisions. State v. Dumler, 221 Kan. 386, 388, 390, 391, 392, 559 P.2d 798.
2. Defective cruise control no defense to violation of section; absolute liability; K.S.A. 21-3204 applied. State v. Baker, 1 Kan. App. 2d 568, 569, 573, 571 P.2d 65.
3. Jury verdict of guilty of exceeding speed limit only held not "moving violation". State v. Herber, 1 Kan. App. 2d 732, 734, 573 P.2d 1112.
4. Conviction hereunder; judicial notice may be taken of reliability of radar whether mounted in a stationary or moving vehicle. State v. Primm, 4 Kan. App. 2d 314, 606 P.2d 112.
5. State's dismissal of action based on necessity and refiling same as not an avoidance of speedy trial limitations (K.S.A. 22-3402) examined. State v. Jamison, 248 Kan. 302, 303, 806 P.2d 972 (1991).
6. Noted in holding that amendment to K.S.A. 22-3404 eliminating right to jury trial for traffic infractions operates prospectively only. State v. Chapman, 15 Kan. App. 2d 643, 814 P.2d 449 (1991).
7. Procedure employed by another state in suspension of license considered in action involving driver charged hereunder. State v. Marshall, 252 Kan. 415, 845 P.2d 659 (1993).