Home >> Statutes >> Back

Click to open printable format in new window.Printable Format
 | Next

22-4710. Unlawful for employers to require certain acts; exceptions; penalties. (a) It is unlawful for any employer or prospective employer to require a person to inspect or challenge any criminal history record information relating to that person for the purpose of obtaining a copy of the person's record in order to qualify for employment.

(b) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a class A misdemeanor.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) or any other provision of this act, an employer may require a job applicant or a prospective independent contractor to sign a release allowing the employer to access the applicant's or independent contractor's criminal history record information for purposes of determining the applicant's fitness for employment.

(d) The bureau may charge an employer a reasonable fee for the preparation of a report detailing such criminal history record information, and pursuant to rules and regulations may establish a fee schedule or charge varying rates depending upon the quantity of information provided.

(e) The bureau shall be immune from any and all claims or causes of action arising from the release of criminal history record information provided to an employer pursuant to a release signed by a job applicant.

(f) No employer shall be liable for any employment decision or decision to enter into a contract with an independent contractor based upon knowledge of such criminal history record information, provided the information that led to the employment or contracting decision reasonably bears upon the independent contractor's, applicant's or employee's trustworthiness, or the safety or well-being of the employer's employees or customers.

History: L. 1978, ch. 118, § 10; L. 1996, ch. 232, § 1; L. 1997, ch. 76, § 1; July 1.

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

"Practical use of Criminal History Information by Kansas Employers," Brent N. Coverdale, 75 J.K.B.A. No. 2, 16 (2006).


1. Texas deferred adjudication is counted as a prior conviction for sentencing purposes in Kansas as Texas court can defer adjudication only after defendant pleads guilty or nolo contendre. State v. Macais, 30 Kan. App. 2d 79, 39 P.3d 85 (2002).

 | Next

  A Summary of Special Sessions in Kansas

  6/03/2024 Meeting Notice Agenda
  LCC Policies

  Chapter 72 Statute Transfer List
  Kansas School Equity & Enhancement Act
  Gannon v. State
  Information for Special Session 2021
  General Info., Legal Analysis & Research
  2023 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2022 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2021 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2020 Amended & repealed Statutes
  2019 Amended & Repealed Statutes

Session Laws

Kansas Legislature
Administrative Services
Division of Post Audit
Research Department