25-1507.
History: L. 1871, ch. 79, § 7; L. 1872, ch. 126, § 1; R.S. 1923, 25-1507; Repealed, L. 1978, ch. 138, § 22; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Correctness of canvass is determinable by mandamus. Light v. The State, ex rel., 14 Kan. 489, 493.
2. Mode and time of appeal stated. The State, ex rel., v. Smith, 31 Kan. 129, 1 P. 251; Clark v. Comm'rs of Montgomery Co., 34 Kan. 632, 9 P. 756.
3. Limitations do not run against state. The State, ex rel., v. Stock, 38 Kan. 154, 16 P. 106.
4. Injunction against second election inoperative until bond given. The State, ex rel., v. Comm'rs of Kearny Co., 42 Kan. 739, 22 P. 735.
5. Second election void where first one uncontested. Brown v. The State, ex rel., 44 Kan. 291, 24 P. 345.
6. Participants in election not estopped from contesting it; proceedings are open to review on mandamus. The State v. Barton, 58 Kan. 709, 51 P. 218.
7. Act construed and applied; questions justiciable; who may bring action. Dunn v. Board of County Comm'rs of Morton County, 165 Kan. 314, 318, 320, 194 P.2d 924.
|
|