Attorney General's Opinions:

Possession of methamphetamine; class C felony. 91-63.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Manufacture of methamphetamine is a felony under statute cited. State v. Lamae, 268 Kan. 545, 998 P.2d 106 (2000).

2. Instruction on word "manufacture" as defined in K.S.A. 65-4101 properly denied. State v. Bowen, 27 Kan. App. 2d 122, 999 P.2d 286 (2000).

3. "Own use" exception of K.S.A. 65-4101 is not an element of crime of manufacturing methamphetamine in violation of K.S.A. 65-4159; defendant has burden of showing application of exception. State v. Gunn, 29 Kan. App. 2d 337, 26 P.3d 710 (2001).

4. Offense of manufacturing controlled substance is properly charged under K.S.A. 65-4159; attempt to manufacture is charged under K.S.A. 21-3301. State v. Martens, 29 Kan. App. 2d 361, 28 P.3d 408 (2001).

5. Manufacturing a controlled substance is charged under K.S.A. 65-4159, but an attempt to manufacture must be charged under K.S.A. 21-3301. State v. Martens, 273 Kan. 179, 54 P.3d 960 (2002).

6. Manufacturing a controlled substance is charged under K.S.A. 65-4159, but attempt to manufacture must be charged under K.S.A. 21-3301. State v. Peterson, 273 Kan. 217, 42 P.3d 137 (2002).

7. Following 1994 amendment, section no longer includes crime of attempting to manufacture a controlled substance. State v. Martens, 274 Kan. 459, 42 P.3d 142 (2002).

8. Purchase of 13 boxes of cold medicine containing pseudoephedrine sufficient to support conviction of attempted manufacture of methamphetamine. State v. Wig, 30 Kan. App. 2d 1078, 55 P.3d 354 (2002).

9. Penalty provision of K.S.A. 65-4127c has no application to violation of K.S.A. 65-4159; no error in imposing severity level 1 felony sentence. State v. Layton, 276 Kan. 777, 80 P.3d 65 (2003).

10. Conviction to manufacture methamphetamine affirmed. State v. Layton, 31 Kan. App. 2d 350, 65 P.3d 551 (2003).

11. Defendant can be sentenced only under lesser penalty provisions of K.S.A. 65-4161 not K.S.A. 65-4159. State v. McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, 83 P.3d 161 (2004).

12. Case decided while appeal in this case was pending, State v. McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, is applied to this case resulting in lesser sentence. State v. Barnes, 278 Kan. 121, 92 P.3d 578 (2004).

13. Elements of K.S.A. 65-4159 and 65-4161 are identical in this case; may be sentenced only under lesser penalty under K.S.A. 65-4161. State v. Stevens, 278 Kan. 441, 101 P.3d 1190 (2004).

14. Sentence is not illegal when it conforms to requirements of section both in character and duration. State v. McCoin, 278 Kan. 465, 101 P.3d 1204 (2004).

15. Favorable decision in another case will not be applied retroactively to this case where defendant benefited from plea agreement and did not file direct appeal. State v. McCoin, 32 Kan. App. 2d 638, 87 P.3d 325 (2004).

16. Where defendant has successfully challenged sentence imposed pursuant to plea agreement, state may withdraw from plea agreement or choose to perform under agreement as modified. State v. Boley, 32 Kan. App. 2d 1192, 95 P.3d 1022 (2004).

17. Sentencing court can consider prior conviction overlooked in presentence criminal history report in another case. State v. Welty, 33 Kan. App. 2d 122, 98 P.3d 664 (2004).

18. Decision in McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, will not be retroactively applied in collateral attack of unappealed sentence. Collins v. State, 33 Kan. App. 2d 460, 103 P.3d 988 (2005).

19. Holding in State v. McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, will not be given retroactive effect. Snyder v. State, 33 Kan. App. 2d 694, 107 P.3d 451 (2005).

20. Upon conviction of attempt to manufacture methamphetamine under K.S.A. 65-4159, six-month sentence reduction provided in K.S.A. 21-3301 applies as defendant must be sentenced under lesser penalty provisions of K.S.A. 65-4161. State v. Herbison, 34 Kan. App. 2d 709, 123 P.3d 561 (2005).

21. Elements of offense differ from K.S.A. 65-4152, 65-4160 and 65-7006, no double jeopardy violation. State v. Schoonover, 281 Kan. 453, 500, 501, 133 P.3d 48 (2006).

22. Identical offense to K.S.A. 65-4161a, remanding for resentencing under lesser penalty provision under McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, correct. State v. Thomas, 283 Kan. 796, 805, 156 P.3d 1261 (2007).

23. Conviction hereunder; law regarding police-citizen encounters discussed and applied to fourth amendment search and seizure issues. State v. Thompson, 284 Kan. 763, 166 P.3d 1015 (2007).

24. Charge hereunder, exceptions to the untimely appeal rule discussed. Casner v. State, 37 Kan. App. 2d 667, 668, 675, 155 P.3d 1202 (2007).

25. Probation is permissible sentence for conspiracy to unlawfully manufacture methamphetamine. State v. Moffit, 38 Kan. App. 2d 414, 415, 418, 419 (2007).

26. Conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and possession of drug paraphernalia not identical crimes; conspiracy requires "an agreement." State v. Denny, 38 Kan. App. 2d 724, 726, 730, 172 P.3d 57 (2007).

27. Mentioned in discussion of attempted DUI; evidence supported the charge of attempt to operate vehicle. State v. Stevens, 285 Kan. 307, 314, 172 P.3d 570 (2007).

28. Conspiracy to manufacture drug reversed, complaint failed to allege overt act. State v. Spangler, 38 Kan. App. 2d 817, 818, 819, 833 to 835, 837, 838, 839, 173 P.3d 656 (2008).

29. Manufacturing methamphetamine under K.S.A. 65-4159 is not identical to K.S.A. 65-4152, using drug paraphernalia. State v. Cooper, 285 Kan. 964, 965 to 967, 179 P.3d 439 (2008).

30. Convictions hereunder vacated; trial court to conduct hearing to determine whether evidence is fruit of poisonous tree. State v. Poulton, 286 Kan. 1, 4, 179 P.3d 1145 (2008).

31. Cited; under the identical offense sentencing doctrine defendant can only be sentenced under lesser penalty. State v. Scoville, 286 Kan. 800, 801, 188 P.3d 959 (2008).

32. Cited; in discussion of McAdam case and the three exceptions for timely appeal of criminal cases. State v. Patton, 287 Kan. 200, 204, 195 P.3d 753 (2008).

33. Cited; criminal elements under K.S.A. 65-4159(a) not identical to elements under K.S.A. 65-4152(a)(3). State v. Thompson, 287 Kan. 238, 240, 256, 259 to 261, 200 P.3d 22 (2008).

34. Sentencing under 21-4705(e) improper; conviction was first conviction for manufacture of controlled substance under K.S.A. 65-4159. State v. Unruh, 39 Kan. App. 2d 125, 127, 131, 134, 135, 138, 177 P.3d 411 (2008).

35. Conviction hereunder; second conviction held to require sentencing pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4705(e). State v. Moore, 39 Kan. App. 2d 568, 571, 573, 181 P.3d 1258 (2008).

36. Cited; court not required to impose nonprison sentence even when such sentence is presumed, when. State v. Andelt, 40 Kan. App. 2d 796, 797, 195 P.3d 1220 (2008).

37. Probable cause for search found in case involving drug charges, based upon smell and plain view of paraphernalia. State v. Ulrey, 41 Kan. App. 2d 1052, 208 P.3d 317 (2009).

38. Manufacture of methamphetamine under K.S.A. 65-4159 is not identical to compounding a controlled substance containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine under K.S.A. 65-4164. State v. Snellings, 294 Kan. 149, 273 P.3d 739 (2012).

This website has moved to KSRevisor.gov