Printable Format

Previous | Next

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Section prohibits possession of drug products containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine as well as drug itself. State v. Frazier, 30 K.A.2d 398, 42 P.3d 188 (2002).

2. Where identical offenses are involved, defendant can only be sentenced under the lesser penalty. State v. Campbell, 278 K. 410, 101 P.3d 1179 (2004).

3. Where offenses have identical elements but are classified differently for punishment, defendant convicted of either may be sentenced only under lesser penalty. State v. Campbell, 279 K. 1, 106 P.3d 1129 (2005).

4. Offenses were overlapping rather than identical; following State v. Campbell, 279 K. 1, 106 P.3d 1129 (2005), defendant should be sentenced under lesser penalty of 65-4152. State v. Cherry, 279 K. 535, 112 P.3d 224 (2005).

5. Elements of statutory offense differs from 65-4152 and 65-4159, no double jeopardy violation. State v. Schoonover, 281 K. 453, 501, 504, 133 P.3d 48 (2006).

6. Conviction hereunder; law regarding police-citizen encounters discussed and applied to fourth amendment search and seizure issues. State v. Thompson, 284 K. 763, 166 P.3d 1015 (2007).

7. Conviction of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine classified as drug severity level 1. State v. Malm, 37 K.A.2d 532, 534, 551, 552, 154 P.3d 1154 (2007).

8. Possession of drug paraphernalia under 65-4152(a)(3) found identical to possession of ephedrine under 65-7006(a). State v. Spangler, 38 K.A.2d 817, 834, 173 P.3d 656 (2008).

9. Convictions hereunder vacated; trial court to conduct hearing to determine whether evidence is fruit of poisonous tree. State v. Poulton, 286 K. 1, 4, 179 P.3d 1145 (2008).

10. Cited; in discussion of McAdam case and the three exceptions for timely appeal of criminal cases. State v. Patton, 287 K. 200, 206, 195 P.3d 753 (2008).

11. Cited; identical offense sentencing doctrine discussed and applied to 65-7006(a) and 65-4152(a)(3), lesser sentence of 65-4152(a)(3) controls. State v. Thompson, 287 K. 238, 240, 242, 243, 247 to 249, 251 to 253, 256, 259, 200 P.3d 22 (2008).

12. Cited in case discussing multiplicity conviction determinations and identical offense rule. State v. Pritchard, 39 K.A.2d 746, 756, 184 P.3d 951 (2008).

13. Discussion about what constitutes the "unit of prosecution" and multiplicity issues. State v. Mendoza, 41 K.A.2d 996, 207 P.3d 1072 (2009).

14. Probable cause for search found in case involving drug charges, based upon smell and plain view of paraphernalia. State v. Ulrey, 41 K.A.2d 1052, 208 P.3d 317 (2009).

15. Conviction and sentence for possession of lithium metal with intent to manufacture a controlled substance affirmed. State v. Adams, 43 K.A.2d 842, 232 P.3d 347 (2010).

16. Statute is not unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. State v. Teter, 47 K.A.2d 608, 278 P.3d 968 (2012).