Printable Format66-118f.
History: L. 1929, ch. 220, § 6; L. 1978, ch. 265, § 4; Repealed, L. 1986, ch. 318, § 146; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Nature and scope of appellate review considered. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co. v. Public Service Comm., 135 Kan. 657, 661, 11 P.2d 985.
2. Nature and scope of appellate review of commission's judicial orders determined. Union Pac. Rld. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 165 Kan. 368, 369, 372, 194 P.2d 939.
3. Motor carrier permit; nature and scope of appellate review; power of court. Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. State Corporation Comm., 169 Kan. 487, 492, 219 P.2d 405.
4. Mentioned; court hearing appeal from commission's decision must strictly follow statutory procedure. City of McPherson v. State Corporation Commission, 174 Kan. 407, 411, 257 P.2d 123.
5. Application for rehearing not condition precedent to appellate review of matter remanded. Stewart v. State Corporation Commission, 181 Kan. 666, 669, 670, 313 P.2d 749.
6. Nature and scope of appellate review considered. Atchison, T. & S.F. Rly. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 182 Kan. 603, 609, 322 P.2d 715.
7. District court review is for purpose of determining whether commission's order unlawful or unreasonable. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 192 Kan. 39, 47, 386 P.2d 515.
8. Trial or review to be based on commission's certified transcript; no new evidence permitted. Pelican Transfer & Storage v. State Corporation Commission, 195 Kan. 76, 80, 402 P.2d 762.