Printable Format66-118f.
History: L. 1929, ch. 220, § 6; L. 1978, ch. 265, § 4; Repealed, L. 1986, ch. 318, § 146; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Nature and scope of appellate review considered. Southern Kansas Stage Lines Co. v. Public Service Comm., 135 K. 657, 661, 11 P.2d 985.
2. Nature and scope of appellate review of commission's judicial orders determined. Union Pac. Rld. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 165 K. 368, 369, 372, 194 P.2d 939.
3. Motor carrier permit; nature and scope of appellate review; power of court. Rock Island Motor Transit Co. v. State Corporation Comm., 169 K. 487, 492, 219 P.2d 405.
4. Mentioned; court hearing appeal from commission's decision must strictly follow statutory procedure. City of McPherson v. State Corporation Commission, 174 K. 407, 411, 257 P.2d 123.
5. Application for rehearing not condition precedent to appellate review of matter remanded. Stewart v. State Corporation Commission, 181 K. 666, 669, 670, 313 P.2d 749.
6. Nature and scope of appellate review considered. Atchison, T. & S.F. Rly. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 182 K. 603, 609, 322 P.2d 715.
7. District court review is for purpose of determining whether commission's order unlawful or unreasonable. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. State Corporation Commission, 192 K. 39, 47, 386 P.2d 515.
8. Trial or review to be based on commission's certified transcript; no new evidence permitted. Pelican Transfer & Storage v. State Corporation Commission, 195 K. 76, 80, 402 P.2d 762.