Printable Format

Previous | Next

Source or Prior Law:

L. 1901, ch. 286, § 39; L. 1907, ch. 268, § 8; Revised, 1923.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Judgment not reversed on facts on appeal where evidence conflicting. Railroad Commissioners v. Railway Co., 71 K. 193, 80 P. 53.

2. Methods of challenging order considered; habeas corpus after contempt denied. In re Luttgerding, 83 K. 205, 209, 110 P. 95.

3. Attorney for board may bring action in name of state. The State, ex rel., v. Railroad Companies, 85 K. 649, 652, 118 P. 872.

4. Railroad entitled to fair profit on each commodity transported. Railroad Co. v. Utilities Commission, 95 K. 604, 605, 615, 624, 148 P. 667.

5. Rates; "unreasonable, unjust, oppressive and unlawful" not synonymous with "confiscatory." Railroad Co. v. Utilities Commission, 95 K. 604, 605, 615, 624, 148 P. 667.

6. Unreasonable, unjust, oppressive or unlawful rates may be annulled. Railroad Co. v. Utilities Commission, 95 K. 604, 605, 615, 624, 148 P. 667.

7. Section is applicable where utility refuses to obey order of commission. State, ex rel., v. Capital Gas & Elec. Co., 139 K. 870, 871, 33 P.2d 731.