Source or Prior Law:

L. 1864, ch. 124, § 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Effect of condemnation on rights of mortgagee. Armstrong v. Moore, 1 Kan. App. 450, 455, 463, 40 P. 834.

2. Procedure in condemnation of land discussed. Missouri River, F.S. & G.R. Co. v. Owen, 8 Kan. 409, 417.

3. Eminent domain; act constitutional and valid. Hunt v. Smith, 9 Kan. 137, 145.

4. Validity of proceedings for condemnation examined. Gulf Railroad Co. v. Shepard, 9 Kan. 647, 652.

5. Railway companies under condemnation do not acquire fee simple title. K.C. Rly. Co. v. Allen, 22 Kan. 285, 292.

6. De facto corporation may exercise right; who may object. Reisner v. Strong, 24 Kan. 410.

7. Right to condemn additional land after line of road completed. C.B.U.P. Rld. Co. v. A.T. & S.F. Rld. Co., 26 Kan. 669.

8. Landowner has right to have farm crossings put in. K.C.E. Rld. Co. v. Kregelo, 32 Kan. 608, 5 P. 15.

9. Right of way; act repealed before construction of road. Roberts v. M.K. & T. Rly. Co., 43 Kan. 102, 111, 22 P. 1006.

10. Right of way; title of owner and of railway company considered. Earlywine v. T.S. & W. Rly. Co., 43 Kan. 746, 748, 23 P. 940.

11. Terminal railroad may exercise the power of eminent domain. The State, ex rel., v. Martin, 51 Kan. 462, 475, 33 P. 9.

12. Landowner under facts estopped to bring ejectment. Buckwalter v. Railroad Co., 64 Kan. 403, 67 P. 831.

13. Railroad may reclaim money; when. Railway Co. v. Wilson, 66 Kan. 233, 234, 69 P. 342.

14. Railway may condemn certain land belonging to another railway. Railway Co. v. Railway Co., 67 Kan. 569, 70 P. 939, 73 P. 899.

15. Railway may condemn separate tract for water station. Dillon v. Railroad Co., 67 Kan. 687, 690, 74 P. 251.

16. Purchase of right of way; description in deed held sufficient. Abercrombie v. Simons, 71 Kan. 538, 542, 81 P. 208.

17. Condemnation proceedings; shops and terminal facilities; measure of damages. Smith v. Railway Co., 90 Kan. 757, 760, 136 P. 253.

18. The line of road must be located before condemnation. Railroad Co. v. Allison, 100 Kan. 472, 474, 164 P. 1068.

19. Section cited in determining right to subsequent appropriation. Ritchie v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Rly. Co., 128 Kan. 637, 643, 279 P. 15.

20. Condemnation by railroad must be in good faith; "aqueducts" and "proper drains" construed. Smouse v. Kansas City Southern Rly. Co., 129 Kan. 176, 282 P. 183.

21. Consideration of how right of way determined; reversion thereof. Danielson v. Woestemeyer, 131 Kan. 796, 799, 803, 804, 293 P. 507.

22. Cited in holding pipe-line company cannot abandon condemnation, when. Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co., 132 Kan. 725, 728, 729, 297 P. 708.

23. Except in special cases, 100-foot strip only subject to condemnation. Lee v. Missouri Pac. Rld. Co., 134 Kan. 225, 229, 5 P.2d 1102.

24. Proceedings are entirely statutory, not ordinary action at law or equity. Todd v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Rly. Co., 134 Kan. 459, 7 P.2d 79.

25. Cited in upholding abandonment of condemnation proceeding instituted under ch. 26, art. 1. State Highway Comm. v. Phillips, 146 Kan. 78, 81, 69 P.2d 12.

26. Gas pipe-line company without authority to condemn underground stratum for gas storage. Strain v. Cities Service Gas Co., 148 Kan. 393, 396, 400, 83 P.2d 124.

27. Landowner need not appeal when condemnation proceeding void; independent action for damages. Dick v. Drainage District No. 2, 187 Kan. 520, 526, 358 P.2d 744.