KANSAS OFFICE of
  REVISOR of STATUTES

  

Home >> Statutes >> Back


Click to open printable format in new window.Printable Format
 | Next

66-906.

History: G.S. 1868, ch. 23, § 86; L. 1870, ch. 74, § 1; L. 1923, ch. 166, § 1; R.S. 1923, 66-906; Repealed, L. 1963, ch. 234, § 103; January 1, 1964.

Source or Prior Law:

L. 1864, ch. 124, § 6.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Several landowners; appeal by company will not transfer entire proceedings. Mo. Pac. Rly. Co. v. Gruendel, 3 Kan. App. 53, 44 P. 439.

2. Evidence admissible in determining value of land. Missouri River, Ft. S. & G.R. Co. v. Owen, 8 Kan. 409, 417.

3. Report of commissioners, validity; notice to "occupant"; map and profile. Hunt v. Smith, 9 Kan. 137.

4. Map, profile and notice; sufficiency of notice considered. Gulf Railroad Co. v. Shepard, 9 Kan. 647.

5. Railroad has no right to land or possession until payment. St. Jos. & D.C. Rld. Co. v. Callender, 13 Kan. 496, 499.

6. Speculative damages may not be allowed. A. & D. Rly. Co. v. Lyon, 24 Kan. 745.

7. Measure of damages considered; what damages may be allowed. Kansas City, E. & S. Rld. Co. v. D. P. Merrill, 25 Kan. 421; Reisner v. Union Depot and Rld. Co., 27 Kan. 382; L.T. & S.W. Rly. Co. v. Paul, 28 Kan. 816; A. & N. Rld. Co. v. Gough, 29 Kan. 94; K.C. & E. Rld. Co. v. Kregelo, 32 Kan. 608, 5 P. 15; C.I. & K. Rld. Co. v. Townsdin, 38 Kan. 78, 15 P. 899; W. & W. Rld. Co. v. Kuhn, 38 Kan. 104, 16 P. 75 (Overruled: W. & W. Rld. Co. v. Kuhn, 38 Kan. 675, 17 P. 322); B.K. & S. Rld. Co. v. Johnson, 38 Kan. 142, 16 P. 125; St. L.K. & A. Rly. Co. v. Chapman, 38 Kan. 307, 16 P. 695; W. & W. Rld. Co. v. Kuhn, 38 Kan. 675, 17 P. 322; L. & W. Rly. Co. v. Hawk, 39 Kan. 638, 18 P. 943; L. & W. Rly. Co. v. Hollis, 39 Kan. 646, 18 P. 947; Weir v. St. L. Ft. S. & W. Rld. Co., 40 Kan. 130, 19 P. 316; L. & W. Rly. Co. v. Butts, 40 Kan. 159, 19 P. 625; L. & W. Rld. Co. v. Ross, 40 Kan. 598, 20 P. 197; C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Hurst, 41 Kan. 740, 21 P. 781; L.N. & S. Rly. Co. v. Herley, 45 Kan. 535, 26 P. 23; L.N. & S. Rly. Co. v. Wilkins, 45 Kan. 674, 26 P. 16; L.N. & S. Rly. Co. v. Usher, 42 Kan. 637, 22 P. 734.

8. New notice required for new proceedings; upon whom notice served. M.K. & C. Rly. Co. v. Parsons Town Co., 26 Kan. 503.

9. Measure of damages for obstruction of alley by railroad company. C.B.U.P. Rld. Co. v. Andres, 26 Kan. 702.

10. This statute held valid. C.B.U.P. Rld. Co. v. A.T. & S.F. Rld. Co., 28 Kan. 453.

11. Appeal by landowner is entry of appearance; what questions waived. A.T. & S.F. Rld. Co. v. Patch, 28 Kan. 470.

12. On failure to file written undertaking, appeal dismissed. Beckwith v. K.C. & O. Rld. Co., 28 Kan. 484, 486.

13. Costs against company on filing disclaimer after appeal taken. St. L., Ft. S. & W. Rld. Co. v. Martin, 29 Kan. 750.

14. Appeal taken in same manner as from justice. St. L., Ft. S. & W. Rld. Co. v. Martin, 29 Kan. 750, 753.

15. Buildings pass with the land; award specified buildings separately. C.I. & Kan. Rld. Co. v. Knuffke, 36 Kan. 367, 13 P. 582.

16. On condemnation buildings pass with land. C.I. & Kan. Rld. Co. v. Knuffke, 36 Kan. 367, 369, 13 P. 582.

17. Meaning of term "owner" in statutes relating to condemnation proceedings. Comm'rs of Smith Co. v. Labore, 37 Kan. 480, 486, 15 P. 577.

18. Railroad has no right to cross without condemnation proceedings. B.K. & S.W. Rld. Co. v. Johnson, 38 Kan. 142, 16 P. 125.

19. Notice set out and held insufficient to nonresident; proceedings void. Mo. Pac. Rly. Co. v. Houseman, 41 Kan. 300, 302, 21 P. 284.

20. Error to introduce evidence of cost of new buildings; damages. C.G.O.C. & O. Rly. Co. v. Center, 42 Kan. 438, 22 P. 574.

21. Appeal bond; not double amount of award; jurisdiction. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Townsite Co., 42 Kan. 97, 99, 21 P. 112.

22. Appeal triable at next term of court after appeal perfected. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Wilkinson, 42 Kan. 337, 22 P. 412.

23. Time of taking appeal, recorded from filing report. K.C. & S.W. Rld. Co. v. Hurst, 42 Kan. 462, 464, 22 P. 618.

24. Appellant, stranger to proceedings, must establish title. C.K. & N. Rly. Co. v. Cook, 43 Kan. 83, 84, 22 P. 988.

25. Elements of damage in making award considered. St. L., Ft. S. & W. Rld. Co. v. Noble, 43 Kan. 310, 313, 23 P. 438.

26. Damages for independent trespasses not recoverable in condemnation proceedings. L.N. & S. Rly. Co. v. Herley, 45 Kan. 535, 26 P. 23.

27. Commissioners after convening may adjourn; original notice held sufficient notice. L.N. & S. Rly. Co. v. Meyer, 50 Kan. 25, 31 P. 700.

28. Appeal bond signed by surety only; no amount stated, void. St. L.K. & S.W. Rly. Co. v. Morse, 50 Kan. 99, 31 P. 676.

29. Actual cash market value at time appropriated must be allowed. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Parsons, 51 Kan. 408, 32 P. 1083.

30. A mortgagee is not an "owner" within meaning of act. C.K.W. Rld. Co. v. Sheldon, 53 Kan. 169, 35 P. 1105.

31. Notice signed by commissioners appointed by court; held valid notice. Clement v. W. & S. W. Rly. Co., 53 Kan. 682, 37 P. 133.

32. Award covering property in use by another railroad held void. Railway Co. v. Railway Co., 67 Kan. 569, 580, 581, 70 P. 939, 73 P. 899.

33. Value of subjacent minerals; not element of damage. Railroad Co. v. Schmuck, 69 Kan. 272, 76 P. 836.

34. Effect of defective description of land in appeal bond. Irrigation Co. v. McLain, 69 Kan. 334, 76 P. 853.

35. Allowance of interest on appeal. Irrigation Co. v. McLain, 69 Kan. 334, 76 P. 853.

36. Liability of purchaser of railway property, rights, etc., pendente lite. Railway Co. v. Murphy, 75 Kan. 707, 714, 90 P. 290.

37. Judgment on appeal binding on purchasing company, when. Railway Co. v. Murphy, 75 Kan. 707, 714, 90 P. 290.

38. Amount of award not evidence, on appeal, of damages sustained. Railway Co. v. Termier, 85 Kan. 11, 116 P. 256.

39. Notice; when sufficient; upon whom binding. Railroad Co. v. Allison, 100 Kan. 472, 474, 164 P. 1068.

40. Number and amount of appeal bonds determined. Burke v. Missouri-K.-T. Rld. Co., 132 Kan. 625, 627, 296 P. 380.

41. Cited in holding pipe-line company cannot abandon condemnation; when. Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co., 132 Kan. 725, 727, 729, 730, 297 P. 708.

42. Interest on award denied where less amount given on appeal. Lee v. Missouri Pac. Rld. Co., 134 Kan. 225, 227, 5 P.2d 1102.

43. On abandonment, landowner cannot recover expenses in contesting proceedings. Todd v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Rly. Co., 134 Kan. 459, 7 P.2d 79.

44. Company failing to elect statute, landowner may appeal under either. Knox v. Great Lakes Pipe Line Co., 135 Kan. 170, 9 P.2d 650.

45. Mentioned; no appeal by condemnor after award deposited and possession taken under 26-101. Lowrey v. State Highway Comm., 170 Kan. 549, 554, 228 P.2d 208.

46. Mentioned; no appeals may be made to supreme court without statutory authority. Williams v. Seymour Packing Co., 174 Kan. 168, 172, 254 P.2d 248.


 | Next

LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL
  12/18/2023 Meeting Notice Agenda
  LCC Policies

REVISOR OF STATUTES
  2023 New, Amended and Repealed by KSA
  2023 New, Amended and Repealed by Bill
  2024 Valid Section Numbers
  Chapter 72 Statute Transfer List
  Kansas School Equity & Enhancement Act
  Gannon v. State
  Information for Special Session 2021
  General Info., Legal Analysis & Research
  2022 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2021 Amended & Repealed Statutes
  2020 Amended & repealed Statutes
  2019 Amended & Repealed Statutes

USEFUL LINKS
Session Laws

OTHER LEGISLATIVE SITES
Kansas Legislature
Administrative Services
Division of Post Audit
Research Department