CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Power of legislature to authorize aid considered; validity of statutes. Leavenworth County v. Miller, 7 Kan. 479; The State, ex rel., v. Nemaha County, 7 Kan. 542; Morris v. Morris County, 7 Kan. 576.

2. Power of city to make contract to reduce bonded liability. City of Troy v. A. & N. Railroad Co., 11 Kan. 519, 532.

3. Construction of statutes; regularity of proceedings; effect of curative act. Lewis v. Comm'rs of Bourbon County, 12 Kan. 186. Criticized: Commissioners, etc., v. Thayer, 94 U.S. 631, 640, 24 L.Ed. 133.

4. Authority to issue bonds; validity of bonds; waiver of conditions. L.L. & G. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Douglas Co., 18 Kan. 169.

5. Right of railroad to accept benefits under L. 1870, ch. 90. A.T. & S.F. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Jefferson Co., 21 Kan. 309.

6. Warrant and bonds issued without authority held void. Salamanca Township v. Bank, 22 Kan. 696.

7. General county or township tax cannot be diverted to bonds. National Bank v. Barber, Treas., etc., 24 Kan. 534.

8. Consolidation of railroads will not release nonconsenting subscriber of stock. A.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Phillips Co., 25 Kan. 261.

9. Township not released from subscription by consolidation of railroads. A.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Phillips Co., 25 Kan. 261.

10. Extent of aid which may be granted by township. A.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Phillips Co., 25 Kan. 261.

11. Petition presented pending question of division of township; mandamus refused. The State, ex rel., v. Comm'rs of Anderson Co., 28 Kan. 67.

12. Township is liable for expense publishing notice special election. Township of Center v. Gilmore, 31 Kan. 675, 677, 3 P. 291.

13. Duty of commissioners to call election when proper petition presented. The State, ex rel., v. Comm'rs of Rush Co., 35 Kan. 150, 10 P. 535.

14. Amount of bonds not controlled by L. 1870, ch. 90. The State, ex rel., v. Comm'rs of Rush Co., 35 Kan. 150, 10 P. 535.

15. Petition to vote aid; duty of county board; limitation amount. The State, ex rel., v. Comm'rs of Rush Co., 35 Kan. 150, 154, 155, 156, 10 P. 535.

16. Election held upon insufficient petition is void. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Chase Co., 43 Kan. 760, 23 P. 1064.

17. Limit prescribed must not be exceeded for any purpose. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Osage Co., 38 Kan. 597, 603, 604, 16 P. 828.

18. Two railroad companies; which entitled to bonds; court determined. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Osage Co., 38 Kan. 597, 607, 16 P. 828.

19. Limitation of township aid; amount may be divided among railroads. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Comm'rs of Osage Co., 38 Kan. 597, 16 P. 828.

20. Petition must be presented to board before election called. K.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Rich Township, 45 Kan. 275, 25 P. 595.

21. Second election; effect where proposition materially different. K.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Rich Township, 45 Kan. 275, 25 P. 595.

22. Railroad may show proper petition for election to vote bonds. K.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Rich Township, 45 Kan. 275, 291, 25 P. 595.

23. Township bonds to aid railroad company; petition. K.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Rich Township, 45 Kan. 275, 291, 25 P. 595.

24. Second election; different proposition; subscription; township bonds to aid company. K.C. & P. Rld. Co. v. Rich Township, 45 Kan. 275, 288, 291, 25 P. 595.

25. City, although part of township, may issue additional bonds. City of Iola v. Merriman, 46 Kan. 49, 26 P. 485.

26. City has power to subscribe bonds although township had subscribed maximum. City of Iola v. Merriman, 46 Kan. 49, 52, 53, 26 P. 485.

27. Aid bonds; valid election; power of township officers. C.K. & W. Rld. Co. v. Ozark Township, 46 Kan. 415, 425, 427, 26 P. 710.

28. Statute unconstitutional because it delegated legislative powers. Comm'rs of Wyandotte Co. v. Abbott, 52 Kan. 148, 167, 34 P. 416.

29. Ordinance not required to authorize; adoption of motion sufficient. Bridge Co. v. Arkansas City, 59 Kan. 259, 262, 52 P. 869.

30. Councilman not disqualified from signing railroad-aid warrants, when. Bridge Co. v. Arkansas City, 59 Kan. 259, 260, 52 P. 869.

31. Time of performance; substantial compliance with terms and conditions. Railroad Co. v. Scott County, 82 Kan. 795, 109 P. 684.

32. Irregularities in sheriff's proclamation for election; defects held merely formal. Railroad Co. v. Scott County, 82 Kan. 795, 109 P. 684.

33. Statutory provision for "second" election does not prevent subsequent election. Railroad Co. v. Scott County, 82 Kan. 795, 806, 109 P. 684.

34. "Railroad" does not include "street railway" or "interurban." O'Malley v. Riley County, 86 Kan. 752, 121 P. 1108.

35. "Railroad," "railroad company," "street railway," and "electric street railway," distinguished. O'Malley v. Riley County, 86 Kan. 752, 755, 758, 121 P. 1108.

36. Manufacturing wrought-iron bridges by private company, not within statute. Citizens' Savings and Loan Assoc. v. Topeka, 87 U.S. 655, 22 L.Ed. 455. Affirming Fed. Cas. No. 2,734.

37. Estoppel by recitals in negotiable bonds or securities. Johnson Co. Comm'rs v. January, 94 U.S. 202, 24 L.Ed. 110.

38. Need not be actual location of road before election is held. Comm'rs, etc., v. Thayer, 94 U.S. 631, 24 L.Ed. 133.

39. Bonds issued in excess of statutory amount no defense; when. Wilson v. Salamanca, 99 U.S. 499, 25 L.Ed. 330.

40. Judgment on bonds; entitled to general tax on city property. United States v. Fort Scott, 99 U.S. 152, 25 L.Ed. 348.

41. Mandamus to compel tax levy to pay bonds. Cherokee County Commissioners v. Wilson, 109 U.S. 621, 3 S. Ct. 352, 27 L.Ed. 1053.

42. Recital in county bonds, when sufficient. Comanche County v. Lewis, 133 U.S. 198, 10 S. Ct. 286, 33 L.Ed. 604.

43. Organization of county; when validity of bonds affected. Comanche County v. Lewis, 133 U.S. 198, 10 S. Ct. 286, 33 L.Ed. 604.