72-8213.
History: L. 1963, ch. 393, § 23; L. 1967, ch. 399, § 1; L. 1972, ch. 278, § 1; L. 1972, ch. 280, § 1; L. 1982, ch. 301, § 3; L. 1984, ch. 261, § 15; L. 1991, ch. 230, § 1; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 167, § 9; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. "Attendance facility" construed; conditions precedent to closing determined. Hand v. Board of Education, 198 Kan.459, 460, 462, 465, 426 P.2d 124.
2. Consent to close attendance facility no prerequisite to issuance of bonds under K.S.A. 72-6761. Masheter v. Vining, 198 Kan.691, 693, 694, 426 P.2d 149.
3. Cited in determination of school board's authority to receive federal funds. Linher v. Unified School District No. 259, Wichita, Kansas, 344 F. Supp. 1187, 1196.
4. Constitutionality upheld; section not void for vagueness and uncertainty. Brickell v. Board of Education, 211 Kan.905, 907, 908, 909, 910, 911, 913, 914, 915, 508 P.2d 996.
5. Where common and high school districts unite to construct building for joint use, electors of disorganized district protected hereunder. Welch v. Board of Education, 212 Kan.697, 699, 700, 702, 703, 704, 705, 512 P.2d 358.
6. Closure of attendance facility; when approval of electors of disorganized school district required. Welch v. Board of Education, 212 Kan.697, 699, 700, 702, 703, 704, 705, 512 P.2d 358.
7. Construed and applied; kindergarten considered as elementary grades required after change; grade six when incorporated in system considered as one of grades required. Meinhardt v. Board of Education, 216 Kan.57, 58, 62, 63, 64, 531 P.2d 438.
8. Mentioned; dismissal of action to enjoin school closing reversed; time limit for direct appeal inapplicable. Linnens v. Board of Education of U.S.D. No. 408, 3 Kan. App. 2d 662, 663, 600 P.2d 152.
9. Construed; authority implied herein to call an election to reduce grade usage at an attendance facility. Hobert v. U.S.D. No. 309, 230 Kan.375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 383, 384, 634 P.2d 1088 (1981).
10. "Elementary school grades" liberally construed; requirement that facility cease to be used unless remodeled constitutes an order under subsection (g). Linnens v. Christensen, 7 Kan. App. 2d 649, 650, 652, 654, 655, 657, 658, 659, 646 P.2d 1141 (1982).
11. Subsection (e); change in use of school facility does not constitute closing of facility to require consent or affirmative vote of majority of qualified electors. Hensley v. Board of Education of Unified School District, 210 Kan.858, 504 P.2d 184 (1972).
12. Subsection (e); change in use of school facility does not constitute closing of facility to require consent or affirmative vote of majority of qualified electors. Hensley v. Board of Education of Unified School District, 210 Kan.858, 859, 860, 861, 862, 863, 864, 504 P.2d 184 (1972).
13. No state agency or officer has power to desegregate schools; authority rests with local school district. Brown v. Board of Educ. of Topeka, 892 F.2d 851, 888 (1989).
|