Printable Format79-3001 through 79-3003.
History: L. 1929, ch. 287, §§ 1 to 3; Repealed, L. 1933, ch. 317, § 29; May 1.
Source or prior law:
L. 1925, ch. 274, §§ 1 through 3.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Act is not unconstitutional. State, ex rel., v. Snell, 127 Kan. 859, 275 P. 209.
2. Venue of prosecutions for failure to pay tax. State v. Snell, 131 Kan. 370, 291 P. 737.
3. City of first class held not authorized to impose occupation tax. McKay v. City of Wichita, 135 Kan. 678, 680, 11 P.2d 733.
4. Action against state officer; venue in Shawnee county. City of Coffeyville v. Wells, 137 Kan. 384, 20 P.2d 477.
5. Cited in reviewing statutory evolution of state highway system. State, ex rel., v. State Highway Comm., 139 Kan. 858, 865, 33 P.2d 324.
6. State does not have preferred claim against delinquent taxpayer's receiver. Sarver v. Sarver Oil Co., 141 Kan. 246, 247, 40 P.2d 394.
7. A county may be a dealer in motor-vehicle fuel. State, ex rel., v. Barton County Comm'rs, 142 Kan. 624, 625, 51 P.2d 33.